New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 680 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2016 (7) TMI 680 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - TMI - Addition u/s 68 - burden of proof - Held that:- As during the penalty proceedings assessee had furnished particulars of 19 creditors who had allegedly advanced money to him. Even that letter does not disclose any address with respect to 8 of the creditors and the creditors whose addresses were furnished by the assessee were not available, according to the finding recorded by the learned Tribunal at the address indicated by the assessee. We, as such, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the Petitioner : Mr. Prtush Jhunjhunwalla, Mr. Debasish De For the Respondent : Md. Nizamuddin, Mrs. A. Qureshi, Mrs.Soma Chatterjee, Advocates ORDER The Court : The appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 27th September, 2004 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata in ITA NO.1492/K/02 pertaining to the assessment year 1994-95 by which an appeal preferred by the assessee was dismissed. The assessee has come up in appeal. The following questions of la .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tribunal was erroneous in law in upholding order confirming addition of unexplained loan transactions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in absence of any material brought on record by the Assessing Officer to hold the loan transactions as unexplained the appellant having already discharged the initial onus of proof as per the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court of India ? Additions were made; (a) on account of alleged share application money (b) on account of money allegedly borrow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the order passed after the order of the Ld.CIT(A) has not carried out the directions given by the Ld. CIT(A) in the original order. We find that in the earlier appellate order the Ld. CIT(A) has directed the Assessing Officer to make enquiries. For making the enquiries the Assessing Officer wrote letter to the creditors but those were returned unserved as the creditors were not available at the address given by the assessee. Thus to say that the Assessing Officer has not made compliance with t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version