GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 689 - ITAT CHENNAI

2016 (7) TMI 689 - ITAT CHENNAI - [2016] 49 ITR (Trib) 22 - Determination of capital gains on the sale of capital asset - short-term capital gains or long-term capital gains - exemption under section 54 denied - period of holding of property inherited by the assessee from his father - application of the cost of acquisition in terms of section 49(1)(iii)(a) - Held that:- In the present case, the assessee inherited the property on November 20, 2005. However, the said property was purchased by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o as to compute the capital gains as short-term capital gains. In other words, capital gains has to be assessed as long-term capital gains by fixing the cost of asset as on April 1, 1981, and, thereafter, applying the cost of inflation index in terms of section49(1)(iii)(a) of the Act and, consequently, the assessee is also entitled for exemption under section 54 of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - I. T. A. No. 549/Mds/2016 - Dated:- 27-5-2016 - Chandra Poojari (Accountant Member) And .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and thereby wrongly applying the cost of acquisition in terms of section 49(1)(iii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and determining the capital gains on the sale of capital asset as short-term capital gains instead of long-term capital gains and refusing the exemption under section 54 of the Act. 3. The facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer received the information that the assessee had sold immovable property measuring an extent of three grounds and 858 square feet for ₹ 5,50,00 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r, Shri Vashdev, and their father, the late Keshavdas, in the year 1971. On the death of their father, i.e., Keshevdas on June 24, 2001, the assessee's father and his brother became entitled to half share each in the property. Out of his half share in the property, the assessee's father, i.e., Shri Harichand gifted one-third share in the property by deed of settlement dated November 20, 2005. The assessee became entitled to one-sixth share in that property. In the computation of total in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ar of sale. As the contention of the assessee was not acceptable, the Assessing Officer issued show-cause notice and reopened the assessment. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act on March 24, 2014, assessing the income of ₹ 48,88,895 by taking the cost of inflation index of 497 relevant for the financial year 2005-06 being the year of possession of the asset and thereby reworked the long-term capital gains and arrived at a tax demand of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee's grandfather, is not brought on record. Therefore, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that there is no document to state when the assessee's father became the owner of the ancestral property. According to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), it is not possible to accept that the period of holding the property by the assessee's grandfather should also be taken into account. Before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the assessee could not est .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which was sold within two and half months on February 2, 2006. Therefore, the assessee sold the property under consideration for less than 36 months and, hence, capital gains should be assessed as short-term capital gains and the assessee is not entitled for corresponding deduction under section54 of the Act. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. We have heard both the sides and perused the material on record. In this case, the assessee's grandfather acquired the property alo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

perty. The assessee's contention is that the cost of inflation index of the said property to be computed from April 1, 1981, and, thereafter, indexation cost to be done. On the other hand, the contention of the learned Departmental representative is that the assessee's father became the legal heir of the impugned property after the demise of his grandfather on June 24, 2001. The settlement deed does not mention whether the assessee's father got the property through will or otherwise. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee's grandfather and his two sons. The assessee's grandfather died on June 24, 2001, and after the death, the assessee's father and his uncle became entitled to half share each in the said property. Out of this half share in the property, the assessee's father gifted one-third share in the property by deed of settlement dated November 20, 2005. The assessee became entitled to one-sixth share in that property. As per section 49(1)(iii)(a) of the Act, whereas the capital asset be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1, 1981, the cost of inflation index relating to the financial year 1981-82 is required to be applied for the purpose of arriving at the index cost of asset. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that the assessee became the owner of the property under consideration only on November 20, 2005, which was sold on February 2, 2006, within a gap of two and half months and it is resulted in short-term capital gains. According to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the assessee becam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

respect of the period of holding of the asset and not in relation to the individuality of the assessee. Accordingly, it was held that for the purpose of determining the period of holding, intermediate transfers on account of succession are to be ignored. Similarly, in the case of Mrs. Pushpa Sofat v. ITO [2002] 81 ITD 1 (Chandigarh), the Chandigarh Bench of this Tribunal has expressed a similar view. We also noticed that as per the provisions of section 2(42A), Explanation 1(i)(b), it is stipul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y from the year in which the assessee became the owner of the property. Contrary to this, the Vishakhapatnam Bench in the case of M. Siva Parvathi v. ITO [2011] 7 ITR (Trib) 468 (Visakhapatnam) held that the assessee having inheritant property purchased by the previous owner in the year 1974, the cost of acquisition for the purpose of computation of capital gains on the sale of such property had to be computed by applying the cost of inflation index by the financial year 1981-82 and not by the f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version