Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Suresh Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax and others

Reopening of assessment - notices issued without jurisdiction - Held that:- In the instant case, the fact is not in dispute that on the request of the petitioner the respondent has provided copy of the reasons recorded by respondent No. 3 as well as the copy of the order passed under section 151 of the said Act. So no case of prejudice caused to the petitioner has been made out. - In the light of the discussion made in the foregoing paras, we are of the view that there is no merit in the pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioner : B. R. Waramaa, Advocate For the Respondent : Alok S. Sharma, Advocate JUDGMENT V. L. Achliya, J. 1. The petitioner herein has preferred this writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking reliefs as under : (A) By issuing writ of certiorari or appropriate writ or directions or orders in like nature, impugned notice dated March 25, 2015 (Exhibit "D") issued by respondent No. 3 and sanction dated March 25, 2015 granted by the learned Additional Com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Commissioner thereon, notice dated August 14, 2015 (exhibit "I") issued by respondent No. 2 and impugned order dated September 16, 2015 (exhibit "J") passed by respond ent no. 2 recording reasons to believe under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act are without jurisdiction, competence and barred by limitation. 2. We have heard learned counsel for respective parties at length and further perused the copies of the impugned notices and orders as well as other documents r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s assigned to the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, i.e., respondent No. 2. Notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter shall be referred to as "the said Act") was issued by respondent No. 2. Subsequently, by order dated February 9, 2012, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Nashik, in exercise of powers under section 127 of the said Act, the file of the petitioner was transferred to the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalgaon. The said order was give .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly, the petitioner had paid the tax. For the subsequent assessment year, the income of the petitioner was assessed and finalised by the Income-tax Officer, Ward No. I(I), Jalgaon. (b) Thereafter, on March 23, 2015, respondent No. 3 decided to reopen the assessment for the year 2010-11 pursuant to the information received from the Director of Income-tax (Intell & Cr.Inv), Mumbai, wherein it is mentioned that, on analysis of the client code modification (CCM) data obtained from National Stock .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s (F and O segments) shown to be debited to profit and loss account and same appears to be loss of ₹ 36,60,755 claimed by the petitioner in the said assessment. In view of this, respondent No. 2 arrived at the conclusion that, there is reason to believe that income to the extent of ₹ 62,82,394 has escaped in the assessment as per third proviso to Explanation 2(c)(i) to section 147 of the said Act. After recording satisfaction that there is reason to believe that the said income has e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on, pleased to grant sanction to reopen the assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year 2010-11 and issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, after recording the reasons. After receiving the sanction from the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, the respondent No. 3 issued notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to the petitioner on March 25, 2015 and called upon the petitioner to submit a return in the prescribed proforma of his income for the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shed to the petitioner and later on, at the request of the petitioner, the copy of the reasons together with the order passed by the sanctioning authority was furnished to the petitioner. On August 14, 2015, respondent No. 2 issued notice under section 142(1) of the Income- tax Act. The petitioner thereafter filed response on September 7, 2015 raising preliminary objection to reopening of assessment of the assessment year 2010-11. On September 16, 2015, the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Cir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lid and without jurisdiction. It is contended that, as the assessment for the year 2010-11 was finalised at the level of the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, respondent No. 3 had no authority to reopen the assessment and issue notice under section 148 of said Act. In this context, the learned counsel has invited our attention to sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and by placing emphasis on the word Assessing Officer used in the said provision and defined under section 2(7A) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

learned counsel appearing for respondents Nos. 1 to 3 has countered the submissions advanced with contention that, in the matter of the petitioner respondent No. 3 is an "Assessing Officer for all purposes under the provisions of Income-tax Act as the case in question falls under his jurisdiction. It is submitted that, the assessment of the subsequent period, i.e., 2011-12 and onwards wherein the petitioner had disclosed the income below ₹ 10.00 lakhs, finalised by respondent No. 3 &a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itioner to the file of the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Range-I, Jalgaon, vide order dated February 9, 2012 for administrative convenience. The Commissioner of Income-tax has specifically mentioned in the order dated February 9, 2012 that transfer order shall remain in force with effect from February 9, 2012 to March 31, 2013 for the assessment year 2010-11. In this background, it is submitted that there is no substance in the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the j .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said definition. Since respondent No. 3 is the Assessing Officer in the matter of the petitioner, no illegality is committed on his part in issuing the impugned notices. He has further submitted that, as respondent No. 3 being "Assessing Officer" for the assessment year 2014-15 for the petitioner, and the information from the Director of Income-tax (Intell and Cr.Inv), Mumbai received to the effect that he has escaped income during the assessment year 2010-11, he acted upon that inform .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1. The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax has considered the same and on due satisfaction that the case is fit for reassessment, was pleased to accord sanction for reopening of case under section 147 of the Income-tax Act as well as issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act. It is therefore submitted that, the entire action on the part of respondent No. 3 was within the bounds of law and in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the said Act. It is further submitted t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ection 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and now the same is dealt with by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Jalgaon. The preliminary objection raised by the petitioner was also dealt with and decided by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax. It is, therefore, submitted that there is no illegality in issuing the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, by respondent No. 3 as well as impugned order passed by respondent No. 2. 6. We have carefully considered the submissions adv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase of the petitioner vests with respondent No. 3 as an "Assessing Officer" of concerned ward. 7. The challenge to the impugned notices and the order passed is based upon the contention that as the assessment for the year 2010-11 was made at the level of the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, respondent No. 3 was not competent to act under section 147 and issue notice under section 148 of the said Act. In this context, it is useful to refer clause (7A) of section 2 of the said Act which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he jurisdiction of the Income-tax authorities. Sub-section (1) of section 120 provides that, Income-tax authorities shall exercise all or any of the powers and perform all or any of the functions conferred on, or, as the case may be, assigned to such authorities by or under the Act in accordance with such directions as the Board may issue for the exercise of the powers and performance of the functions by all or any of those authorities. Sub-section (3) of section 120 of the said Act provides tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income up to 10.00 lakhs to entertain the case of the petitioner for assessment lies with respondent No. 3 and the assessment of the period 2011-12 onwards. As the information was received from the Director of Income-tax (Intell and Cr.Inv), Mumbai and it was found that the petitioner had escaped certain income during the assessment year 2010-11, respondent No. 3 proceeded with the matter. After recording satisfaction that there is reason to believe that the income has been during assessment ye .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

10-11 as well as to issue notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Pursuant to notice dated March 25, 2015, issued under section 148 of the said Act, the petitioner appeared on April 22, 2015 and filed the copy of return of income for the assessment year 2010-11. In response to the notice dated March 25, 2015, the petitioner has not raised any objection as to the jurisdiction of respondent No. 3 to issue such notice. The petitioner requested for providing the copy of reasons recorde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ax vide order dated September 16, 2015 passed in the matter. 9. In our view the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income- tax is a speaking and well reasoned order. As soon as respondent No. 3 noted from the copy of Income-tax return, the return for income filed for the year 2010-11 are more than one crore and the assessment was made by the Joint Commissioner, he transferred the file to the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax as per the procedure laid down in section 127 of the said Act a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

February 9, 2012 to March 31, 2013, there is no force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that officer not below the rank of the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax can only make reassessment. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, who is now dealing with the case is duly competent and possess the pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction to deal with the case of the petitioner for reassessment. For this reason alone, we are not inclined to accept the contention of learned counsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

chargeable for the assessment year 2010-11, the petitioner has escaped certain amount from assessment within the meaning of third proviso to Explanation 2(c)(i) to section 147 of the said Act. In the notice it is also mentioned that necessary approval has been granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax for issuing such notice. The petitioner has responded to the said notice dated March 25, 2015 on April 22, 2014. However, no objection as to jurisdiction is raised. The objection as to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

September 7, 2015. As provided under sub-section (3) of section 124 of the said Act, no person is entitled to call in question the jurisdiction of an Assessing Officer after the expiry of the time allowed by the notice issued under section 148. Section 124 of the Income-tax Act reads as under : "124. (1) Where by virtue of any direction or order issued under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 120, the Assessing Officer has been vested with jurisdiction over any area, within the l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of an Assessing Officer- (a) where he has made a return under sub-section (1) of section 115WD or under sub-section (1) of section 139, after the expiry of one month from the date on which he was served with a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142 or sub-section (2) of section 115WE or sub-section (2) of section 143 or after the completion of the assess ment, whichever is earlier ; (b) where he has made no such return, after the expiry of the time allowed by the notice under sub-section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Kumar Jain v. Deputy CIT reported in [2016] 381 ITR 428 (Delhi). In our view the decision in the case of Dushyant Kumar has no bearing upon the facts of the present case. The facts of the case cited are altogether different from the present case. In the case cited the notice was issued and reasons for reopening assessment were recorded by the Income-tax Officer, who was not the Assessing Officer for the assessee for the concerned assessment year. So also the notice was found to be issued beyon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cer, Ward No. 1, Jalgaon. 12. As discussed in the foregoing paras, respondent No. 3 had issued the notice under section 148 of the said Act after seeking necessary approval under section 151 of the said Act. The proceeding is already transferred by respondent No. 3 to the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, who is vested with the jurisdiction to deal with the matters having valuation more than 10.00 lakhs. The objections raised by the petitioner also decided by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of this, we find no merit in the submissions advanced that the impugned notice issued by respondent No. 3 is illegal, bad in law and without jurisdiction. So also, we find no infirmity in the order dated September 16, 2015 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax. 13. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that reasons recorded by respondent No. 3 and the copy of the order of sanction were not furnished along with notice dated March 25, 2015 and same was furnished and th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Forum: Input tax credit

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version