Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Endeavour Instruments P. Ltd. Versus The ITO, Ward-4 (1) , Ahmedabad

Depreciation on motor car - car purchased in the names of the Directors of the assessee-company - Held that:- It is an undisputed fact that though the car has been purchased in the name of the two Directors of the Company, but it is reflected in the balance-sheet of the assessee. We find that on identical facts, on similar issue the Coordinate Bench in the case of Afflon Alpast [2015 (1) TMI 1234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD] wherein held that mere non-registration of a vehicle in the name of the company un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Madhusudan, Sr.DR ORDER PER SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-VIII, Ahmedabad dated 18/02/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. The relevant facts as culled out from the materials on record are as under:- 2.1. Assessee is a company stated to be engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of electronic weighing scales and its parts. Assessee electronically filed its return of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

granted partial relief to the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us and has raised following grounds:- 1. The learned CIT(A) has erred both in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the disallowance of ₹ 2,72,972/- made in respect of depreciation on cars purchased during the year under consideration. 2. Both the lower authorities have passed the orders without properly appreciating the fact and that they further erred in grossly ign .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cts of the case in confirming action of the ld.AO in initiating penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act. 2.2. Before us, ld.AR submitted that though various grounds have been raised, but the solitary issue which is to be decided is with reference to depreciation on motor car. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO on perusing the depreciation statement, noticed that a Honda Civic Car was purchased in the name of Directors, namely, S/Shri Paragbhai Rameshbhai Shah and Kamleshbhai M.Upadhyaya, b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

decision of Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of M.M.Fisheries (P) Ltd. vs. CIT reported at 277 ITR 204 (Del) concluded that since assessee has failed to furnish any proof to demonstrate that the vehicle was used for the purpose of business of the company, disallowed the claim of depreciation amounting to ₹ 2,72,972/-. Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee carried the matter before the ld.CIT(A), who upheld the order of AO by holding as under:- 3.3. I have considered the facts of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt company is not the legal owner of the motor car. For claim of depreciation, the two conditions are to be fulfilled namely-appellant must be owner of the asset and it must be used for the purpose of appellant's business. In this case appellant is not the owner since the ownership vests with the director who is separate entity than the appellant company. As regards use of these cars for the purpose of business, the same were not furnished. Therefore; use of car for the purpose of company .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e purpose of appellant's business. Coming to the appellant's argument of beneficial ownership, appellant submitted that payment for the car was made by the company and hence the appellant is the beneficial owner. Payment will not determine the ownership since payment can be made by way of loan also. In fact major payment is made by finance company but it is not the beneficial owner. Since both appellant and its director are separate entities and directors are not permanent, it cannot be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision in the case of Mysore minerals Ltd. It would be very relevant to refer three-member decision of honorable Supreme Court in the case of Tamil Nadu civil supplies Corporation Ltd versus CIT reported in 249 ITR 214. In this larger bench decision of apex court, earlier decision of- Mysore minerals Ltd was also considered. The said decision was distinguished on facts and it was held that since assessee has not acquired Dominion over asset in question, claim of depreciation is. not allowed. In a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urpose of business. If appellant is not able to prove either in the light of larger bench decision of Supreme Court, claim of depreciation on assets standing in others name cannot be allowed. The decisions of other high Courts have been considered. In all those decisions the user of asset namely transport buses etc were by the companies and the companies were disclosing the income from hiring those vehicles. The user of asset for the purpose of business was proved in all these cases beyond doubt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ITAT is not followed which has not considered these decisions. It is therefore held that the depreciation claimed by the appellant is correctly disallowed by the assessing officer. The ground of the appellant is dismissed. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us. 3.1. Before us, ld.AR reiterated the submissions made before the AO and ld.CIT(A) and further submitted that on identical issue, the Coordinate Bench of Tribunal (ITAT D Bench Ahmedabad) in the ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below as well as the decision relied upon by the ld.AR. The issue in the present case is with respect to depreciation on the car which has been purchased in the names of the Directors of the assessee-company. It is an undisputed fact that though the car has been purchased in the name of the two Directors of the Company, but it is reflected in the balance-sheet of the assessee. We find that on identical facts, on similar issue the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rove that the expenses have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and were not in personal in nature. On perusing the Balance sheet placed by the Assessee in the paper book, it is seen that the motor car is reflected in the schedule of fixed assets. Before us, Revenue has not brought any material on record to controvert the submissions of Assessee that the funds of Assessee has been used for the purchase of motor car. We further find that on identical facts, in the cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not be controverted by the Revenue by bringing any material on record. We find that the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Studio-3 Architect Pvt Ltd (supra) held as under:- "5. We have heard both the parties and gone through the facts of the case. The relevant provisions of section 32 of the Act stipulate depreciation in respect of building, machinery, plant or furniture "owned by the assessee" and "used" for the purposes of the business or profession. Indisputably, the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee under the Motor Vehicles Act, the assessee would not be entitled to deduction of depreciation allowance in respect thereof. We are of the opinion that the assesses, who had purchased the car for valuable consideration and used the same for its business, cannot be denied the benefit of depreciation on the ground that the transfer was not recorded under the Motor Vehicles Act or that the vehicle stood in the name of a director of the assessee company in the records of the authorities u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eaning of s. 32 of the Act. Similar view was taken in the case of CIT Vs, Mohd. Bus Shokat Ali (No.2), 256 ITR 357 (Raj), CIT Vs Fazilka Dabwali TPT Co. Ltd (2004) 270 ITR398 (P & H), CIT v. Salkia Transport Associates [1983] 143 ITR 39/13 Taxman 191 (Cal), CIT v. Nidish Transport Corpn. [1910] 185 ITR 669/[1989] 44 Taxman 351(Ker.), CITv. Dilip Singh Bagga [1993] 201 ITR 995/11994] 77 Taxaman 66 (Bom), CIT v Navdurga Transport Co. [1999] 235 ITR 158 (All.) and CIT v Basti Sugar Mills Co. Lt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Notification: Seeks to exempt goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: INELIGIBLE INPUT TAX CREDIT UNDER GST REGIME

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Article: All about E-way Bill under GST

Highlight: Provision for sick leave liability - based on the basis of notional figures - such notional liability cannot be allowed as deduction - section 43B(f) is not applicable.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version