Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

MARINE FINS Versus UNION OF INDIA

2016 (7) TMI 778 - KERALA HIGH COURT

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark. - Petition challenge the notification on the ground that the notification issued is without any application of mind or without any basis. They also challenge it on the ground that the notification is issued by the Director General of Foreign Trade, who is not the competent authority to issue such notification. - Held that:- While exercising the power of judicial review under Article 226 of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

noted that the Central Government deliberated the issue and the relevant factors have been taken into account for the decision. The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of validity as a pre-requisite. The decision makers need not establish or demonstrate that the decision would secure its objectives. The ultimate decision by passage of time may prove the decision was right or wrong. The freedom of the decision makers to have the choice must be left to their discretion. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

STAQUE, J. PETITIONER BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL R4 BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE,SC,CEN.BOARD OF EXCIS JUDGMENT These batch of writ petitions are filed challenging a notification issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Central Government under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1982 (for short, the "Act") prohibiting export of Shark fins of all species of Shark. The notification was issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aints were raised from certain quarters against Shark finning. A meeting was held on 13/1/2015 under the Chairmanship of the Commerce Secretary. The meeting discussed about restriction on capture/export of all species of Sharks/Shark products. Various stake holders have taken part in the meeting. Though different concerns were expressed, it appears that after the discussion, the Commerce Secretary took the view that trade in Shark Fins (both exports and imports) should be banned. This was with t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vel. It is further argued that there is no ban on fishing of Sharks. The learned counsel points out that Sharks are not captured on targeted fishing, as Sharks do not travel in a group. It is further submitted that it is impossible to avoid capture of Sharks by fishermen. Therefore, since there is no ban on capture of Sharks, and there is no ban on consumption of Sharks at domestic level, prohibition of Shark finning alone is without any basis. It is also submitted that the ban imposed is withou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

91], Federation of Railway Officers Association and others v. Union of India [(2003) 4 SCC 289] and Union of India and another v. International Trading CO. And Another [(2003) 5 SCC 437]. 6. On the other hand the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India submits that Shark fins, both in terms of quantity and value are very small and there is no much domestic consumption of Sharks. It is pointed out that fishermen are involved in gruesome practice of finning of Sharks, resulting in decline in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd others [(1984) 3 SCC 465], M/s.D.Navinchandra and Co.Bombay and others v. Union of India and others [(1987) 3 SCC 66], Subhash Photographics and others v. Union of India and others [(1993) Supp.3 SCC 323], S.B.International Ltd. and others v. Asstt.Director General of Foreign Trade and others [(1996)2 SCC 439], Indian Handicrafts Emporium and others v. Union of India and others [(2003)7 SCC 589], [2009 KHC 4571], Maine v. Robert J.Taylor and United States [477 US 131, 91 L Ed 2d 110, 106 S Ct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ral Government to formulate its Foreign Trade policies from time to time. The notification produced and challenged before this Court would clearly show that the notification is issued by the Central Government and not by the Director General of Foreign Trade. Therefore, what remains to be decided is whether the policy framed by the Central Government suffers from any infirmity with the decision making process. 10. It is well settled principle of law by umpteen decisions, that the Court must resp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icularly a developing country, has necessarily to be tuned to its general economic policy founded upon its constitutional goals, the requirements of its internal. and international trade, its agricultural and industrial development plans, its monetary and financial strategies and last but not the least the international political and diplomatic overtones depending on friendship, neutrality or hostility with other countries' (Glass Chotans Importers and Users' Association v. Union of Indi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the domain of the Courts to embark upon enquiry as to whether particular public policy is wise and acceptable or whether better policy could be evolved is beyond the interference by the Courts. 13. In a recent judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in Parisons Agrotech (P) Ltd.'s case [(2015) 9 SCC 657], It was held as follows: "Held, once it is found that there is sufficient material for taking a particular policy decision, bringing it within the four .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd, the Central Government appears to have been moved by the concern, to stop depletion of the Sharks in the marine environment, especially, in Indian waters to protect the marine eco-system. The Shark appears to be considered as an apex of the marine food chain. Certainly, this is a relevant factor for formulating any policy by the Central Government. The petitioners' challenge is mainly on the ground that there is no ban on capture of Sharks and there is no ban on domestic consumption of S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

meeting held on 26/11/2014 (Ext.P10), the following decision was minuted: "Summing up the discussion, CS told that as per the discussions, there are 50 to 60 varieties of Sharks out of which only 9 are prohibited as per the provisions of Wildlife (Protection) Act. Hence, legally, action cannot be taken against those exporters who have exported the Shark fins, parts etc not covered under the prohibited category. However, there is a need to educate/spread awareness among the fishermen not to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, in the meeting held on 13.1.2015 [Ext.R2(e)], the Commerce Secretary summed up the discussion as follows: "7. After further discussions, the CS directed that in so far as Department of Commerce is concerned, the trade in shark fins (both export and imports) should be banned, keeping in view the ecological aspects resulting out of the fishing and finning of sharks in the Indian EEZ. He further stated that in so far as capture of sharks/shark fins, and issue of permits to foreign vessels fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version