Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Kanhai Corporation, Arjun Exotica and Others Versus ACIT, Central Circle-1 (4) , Ahmedabad

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - defaults of not complying with notices for Assessment Year 2011-12 - Held that:- The contentions of ld. DR carry merits inasmuch as the impugned penalties were imposed on 19-12-2012 much prior to the framing of assessments on 17-1-2014. In view thereof the case laws cited by the assessee are distinguishable. Assessee has failed to demonstrate that there was any understanding with ld. AO as tried to be canvassed. Besides in any case adjournment applications ought to have b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

NI, JUDICIAL MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri Ankit Talsania, AR For The Revenue : Shri Antony Pariath, Sr DR ORDER These appeals by six different assessees are directed against separate orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-I, Ahmedabad of even date 16.05.2013, confirming the levy of penalty of ₹ 10,000/- in each imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for the defaults of not complying with notices for Assessment Year 2011-12. Since all these appeals pertain t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the assessee s representative requested to the Assessing Officer that individual cases may be taken up first and thereafter the cases of the companies and firms may be taken up. According to assessee, AO agreed for this, therefore, nobody attended the proceedings. Accordingly, it was requested to drop the penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. He further contends that the assessee was also submitted to the Assessing Officer that the required submission was being made on 18.12. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed till 31.03.2013, even though the assessee has furnished all the details called for by the Assessing Officer. 2.2 The assessment proceedings have been passed u/s 143(3) of the Act and not u/s 144 of the Act without, reliance is placed on following cases has held that when the assessment order has been passed u/s 143(3) of the Act and not u/s 144 of the Act, then the non-compliance is deemed to have been waived, and accordingly, penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act has been deleted by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ore also, penalty could not have been levied in pursuant to the provisions of Section 273B of the Act. 3. Ld. Departmental Representative, on the other hand vehemently contends that the Assessing Officer was right in imposing the penalty in question as the assessee failed to comply with the notices issued by the Assessing Officer. No such understanding as claimed by the assessee emerges from the record, besides if there was any semblance of any merit in assessee s contention, these facts should .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

utory notices. Attention is drawn to the observations of ld. AO and ld. CIT(A) in this behalf in the lead case of Kanhai Corporation: Observations of ld. AO 5. The submission of the assessee is not acceptable. The survey in the case of assessee group was conducted on 21.09.2010, assessee filed its returns on 28.09.2011 and the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued on 17.09.2012. Thereafter, notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 17.10.2012 asking the assessee to furnish details on 30.10.20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s, the assessee ought to have submitted the details called for. However, for reasons best known to the assessee, it opted not to comply with the terms of notice u/s 142(1) of the Act. Therefore, the assessee has no reasonable cause to offer for the inordinate delay in complying to the terms of statutory notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the undersigned is satisfied that this is a fit case for levy of penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income tax Act, 1961. Observations of ld. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot u/s 144 of the Act. IN those cases the ITAT held that since the assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not u/s 144 of the Act, the AO had waived the noncompliance. In the instant case the assessment has not been completed as yet hence it cannot be presumed that the AO has waived the non-compliance. Rather the reverse is true that the AO has held that the appellant has not bothered to comply with the notice deliberately and made observations about misplaced understanding which was never th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version