Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Chandrakant N. Patel Versus The Income-tax Officer, Ward 14 (3) , Ahmedabad

Addition of unexplained investments in purchase of agricultural land u/s 69 - Benami transations (Prohibition) Act 1988. - Held that:- There is no evidence on record rebutting the same. We further find that this assessee has been showing agricultural income as per the impugned order. This is not the case with co-purchaser Shri Girish Kumar. We notice that he is in fact a cloth trader. That being the case, this co-purchaser could not have purchased the agricultural lands in question under Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

isions of the Benami transations (Prohibition) Act 1988. - We have already held this assessee to have paid the entire purchase consideration of ₹ 83,13,850/- in question forming subject matter of the impugned unexplained investment addition made u/s.69 of the Act. The same stands confirmed. - Decided against assessee. - ITA. No.2272/Ahd/12 - Dated:- 11-7-2016 - SHRI S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Assessee : Shri P. F. Jain, A.R. For The R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,850/-. 3. We come to relevant facts first. This assessee along with one Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas purchased agricultural land admeasuring 2 hectares 23 acres and 56 sq.mtrs. in Khata no.745, Survey No.1036, Village Kathwada, Taluka Dascroi, Dist. Ahmedabad by way of registered purchase deed dated 29.09.2008. The sale consideration therein reads a sum of ₹ 78,50,000/- followed by stamp duty and registration charges of ₹ 3,85,000/- and 78,850/-; respectively. There is further no dispu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and his name was merely in the capacity of a friend. The other co-vendee in fact executed an affidavit dated 22.06.2010 supporting the assessee s case. He took a contrary stand in his own assessment through a reply filed on 22.12.2011 pleading therein that no payment of the purchase price was in fact made since the entire transaction was based on a fraudulent power of attorney and same stood cancelled later on. He further stated to have executed the affidavit in question in order to get the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ultural land jointly admeasuring two hectares, 23 acres and 56 sq. meters for a total consideration of ₹ 78,50,000/-. Purchase deed was executed and registered in the office of Sub-registrar, AHD-7, Odhav, Ahmedabad at Sr. No. 11870 - 2003 on 29.09.2008. b) That the entire sale consideration of ₹ 78.5 lacs was paid in cash in piecemeal. This factum of payment in cash is evident in column No. 11 on page 19 & 20 of the purchase deed. The stamp duty payment of ₹ 3.85 lacs and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the entire purchase price of ₹ 78.5 lacs with stamp and registration charges was paid by Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas alone. e) That the AO, while recording the statement of Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas, also observed question No.5 that Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas submitted under oath that he paid only ₹ 11 lacs as a token money. Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas also submitted under oath that stamp duty and registration expenses were incurred equally by both the purchasers and the document for r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cross-examine the other co-owner, Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas which was duly done by the appellant. 4.2 During the course of appellate proceedings, the appellant rebutted the observation of the AO. The relevant portion of the submissions are reproduced herein as under for the sake of convenience: "These findings of the assessing officer are rebutted as under. 1. As noted in the assessment order assessee filed return of income 22-07- 2009 and his case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inting out that the document of agricultural land was executed on 29-09-2008 vide registration No.11870. But the real fact is that the alleged cash consideration of ₹ 78t50,000 was paid by Girish Ramanlal alone and this land has been purchased by him alone. Further he has also clarified that as joint owner the name of Shri Chandrakant Nathalal being assessee has been shown as friend only. In this land Chandrakant Nathalal has no share or right of whatsoever . He has also clarified that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e sale deed proves beyond doubt the contentions of the assessee that he has not invested any amount in the land and he has not incurred any expenditure towards any stamp duty and registration charges. It is pertinent to point out that this affidavit has been executed before the return of income filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny because the date of notice issued u/s 143(2) is 20-08-2010 whereas the date of affidavit is 22-06- 2010.When the affidavit was executed the assessee did not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee. By this documentary evidence the burden of proof on the assessee that no investment has been made by him is fully discharged. 4. The assessee has came to know that the assessment of Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas having PAN:ABIPV 5929R for A. Y.2009-10 has also been passed under scrutiny and from the said assessment order it is noticed that same addition of ₹ 83,13,850 has been made in his case for the purchase of same agricultural land on substantive basis and this addition in the han .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in the case of ITO V/s C.H.Atchaiah 218 ITR 239, that A.O can and he must tax the right person and the right person alone1. 5. Sale deed bearing No.11870 dated 29-09-2008 has been executed between assessee and Girish Ramanlal Vyas as purchaser and Shri Bijalbhai Khengasrbhai Rabari residing at Morali Gam Dist. Gandhinagar. As mentioned in the sale deed this land has been purported to have been purchased by the seller from the original land owners Shri Ranchhodbhai Bhalabhai, Ramabhcii Bhal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also. It has been further clarified that no payment on execution of sale deed was paid to the seller. It may kindly be noted that this cancellation deed 30-06-2010 has also taken place prior to the initiation of scrutiny proceedings which has taken place in the month of August.2010. 6. Another document titled as Kabulat Cum Indemnity Bond has been executed on 30-6-2010 duly registered with the Sub-Registrar vide registration No.9185 between Shri Bijalbhai Khengarbhai Rabari, Desai Melabhai Goka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndly be noted that this deed dated 30-06- 2010 has also taken place prior to the initiation of scrutiny proceedings which has taken place in the month of August.2010. 7. It is also relevant to point out that Special Suit No 474/2008 was filed on 23-10-2008 as mentioned above. Pursuant This Suit filed by the original land lord Shri Ranchodbhai Bhalabhai Patel and others against (1) Shri Bijalabhai Khengarbhai Rabari and(2) Desai Melabhai Gokabhai the Court has issued notice of hearing dated 23-10 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.2009-10. Because of criminal complaint in the year 2008 and the civil suit also filed in the year 2008 the parties to the bogus sale deed were forced to execute cancellation deeds to escape, legal actions consequences. The impugned sale deeds were executed in the month of September ,2008 in the month of October 2008 itself the land owners on 9. Coming to know of such forged deeds swiftly moved the court for the intervention and declaring the said deeds as null and void ab-initio. Without enquir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecision of Sumati Dayal 214 ITR 801 S.C) Therefore the findings/observations/ comments appearing on page 16 of assessment order are contrary to the law and therefore deserved to be rejected. 10. After submission of these legal documents which have also been executed prior to initiation of scrutiny proceeding and if the assessing officer was doubting these documents and considering these documents as an afterthought then he was under legal obligation to make independent inquiries to ascertain the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessing officer and hence the entire finding of the assessing officer gets vitiated legally as well as factually. 11. In view of above facts and circumstances the addition of ₹ 83,13,850/- made u/s. 69 as unexplained investment deserves to be deleted in its entirety." 4.3 I have perused the assessment order, paper-book along with other evidences filed by the appellant and material on record, lam not inclined to agree with the contentions of the appellant because of the following rea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and therefore statement recorded u/s. 131 of the Act is true and correct and final and is devoid of merits as it is contrary to facts mentioned in purchase deed and as well as affidavit filed by Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas. It may be noticed that the facts in the affidavit by Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas are completely in variance to the facts submitted under oath before the AO. (c) The plea of the appellant that substantive additions have already been made in the case of Shri Girish Ramanlal Vyas an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

authorities' action of assessing income protectively has been held justified even by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India - Lalji Haridas Vs. ITO & Anr. (S.C.) 43 ITR 387. 4.5 Under the stated circumstances, that there is a sale deed wherein cash payment of ₹ 78.5 lacs is evidenced and stamp duty is also paid in cash, the contradictory statement given by the other co-owner i.e. Shri Girish R. Vyas. When compared with his affidavit dated 22.06.2010 and other overwhelming facts brough .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ven if the same is to be added without prejudice to the former stand. He further highlighted the facts both the lower authorities have assessed the very sum on substantive basis in co-purchaser s hands. The assessee accordingly seeks to add the entire sum in case of his co-purchaser in view of his affidavit dated 22.06.2010. Learned Counsel accordingly prays for the acceptance of the appeal. The Revenue strongly supports the lower appellate s order. 6. We have given our thoughtful consideration .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vade the burden of explaining source of the gross investment amount. There can be hardly any dispute that this explanation was source of the investment in question has no bearing with the fact that the above stated sale deed stood cancelled later on for any reason; whatsoever. We reiterate that it s a registered sale deed carrying presumption of truth. We are of the opinion that the assessee s first argument that the sale deed cancellation renders the entire issue infructuous is devoid of merits .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies have elaborately appreciated the relevant facts as extracted hereinabove to conclude that it is actually assessee s investment and not that of his co-purchaser. There is no evidence on record rebutting the same. We further find that this assessee has been showing agricultural income as per the impugned order. This is not the case with co-purchaser Shri Girish Kumar. We notice that he is in fact a cloth trader. That being the case, this co-purchaser could not have purchased the agricultural l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version