Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Manibhai Virchandbhai Patel

Disallowance on account of interest expenses - ITAT allowed the claim - Held that:- While the Department has consistently accepted the claim of the assessee in the earlier years when the income under the head “income from other sources” was more than the interest expenditure, such claim is sought to be disallowed in the year under consideration only because the interest expenditure exceeds the interest income. Having regard to the past history of the assessee, this court is of the view that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- revenue in both these appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) has challenged the common order dated 18th August, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C Bench, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) by proposing the following common question, stated to be a substantial question of law:- [A] Whether the ITAT has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of ₹ 1,09,29,139/- made by the AO on account .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssing Officer did not accept the revised return on the ground that the original return was not filed within the time and, therefore, the assessee could not file the revised return. On scrutiny of the matters, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had claimed interest expenses of ₹ 1,09,29,139/- as against the interest income of ₹ 50,27,815/-. The Assessing Officer noted the details of the interest earned and interest paid and after considering the explanation of the assessee, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been added as new parties to whom the interest had been paid during the year under consideration. It was also a fact that the new advances/loans had been obtained from the existing parties as well as the new parties and interest had been paid on the same. According to the Commissioner (Appeals), if the amount taken on interest was invested directly for earning interest, then there should not be any loss as shown by the assessee and that such loss can arise only if the loans/advances are taken a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o earn the interest income. The Commissioner (Appeals) was of the view that the assessee would have incurred 95% of interest expenditure to earn interest income of ₹ 50,27,815/-. In other words, the assessee would earn higher rate of interest which would result in 5% earning from interest activity and accordingly held that interest expenditure of ₹ 47,76,424/- should be allowed to the assessee and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the interest addition of ₹ 47,76,424/- a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

these appeals. 3. Tax Appeal No.361/2016 arises out of the order passed by the Tribunal in the appeal preferred by the revenue and Tax Appeal No.362/2016 arises out of the appeal preferred by the assessee before the Tribunal. 4. Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned senior standing counsel assailed the impugned order by submitting that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the total expenditure is to be allowed which is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning income and that the same cannot be restric .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e earned in accordance with section 57 of the Act. It was, accordingly, urged that the appeals require consideration on the question of law as proposed or as may be deemed fit by the court. 5. From the facts noted hereinabove, it is evident that the assessee had claimed expenditure of ₹ 1,09,29,139/- and had shown interest income at ₹ 50,27,815/-. As can be seen from the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), he has recorded as a matter of fact that the assessee had shown intere .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issioner (Appeals), no business man would borrow funds at a higher rate of interest and invest those funds at a lower rate of interest which would result into a loss. He further found that the material available on the record suggested that the assessee had borrowed the funds at a lesser rate of interest than the interest on investment. The Commissioner (Appeals) has, therefore, proceeded on the basis of a presumption that the assessee would have incurred 95% of interest expenditure to earn inte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was satisfied that assessee had taken loans/borrowings at interest and invested those for earning interest income which has been shown as income from other sources . In the past, such income was accepted and expenditure was allowed because assessee has more interest income than the expenditure. This year, Ld. First Appellate Authority did not allow the claim of assessee fully for the reason that interest income was not sufficient to take care of interest expenditure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ission income also which is a positive figure of ₹ 18,33,271/-. This income was also offered as income from other sources . The assessment order for Assessment Year 2009-10 was passed u/s. 143(3) on 30th December, 2011. The assessee has filed his return on 2nd November, 2010 declaring a loss of ₹ 23,69,658/-. The Assessing Officer has made an addition of ₹ 3,44,417/-. This addition was made with regard to the sale of land where assessee has received some cash component in his s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

en Manibhai Patel Maulik Manibhai Patel are concerned, they are the persons who have advanced the money to the assessee and to whom interest was paid. To these very persons, interest have also been paid in the present year. Thus, the loan was taken from these persons long back and every year assessee has been paying at the same rate of interest. In spite of the search neither in the earlier year nor in the subsequent years, claim of the assessee was disputed that the money taken from them was no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore, only to that extent, interest expenditure is to be allowed. But that is not the requirement in law, the requirement is that expenditure must be laid down by the assessee wholly and exclusively for earning of income. The expression wholly refers to quantum of expenditure and exclusively refers to the object and purpose of expenditure. Though these expressions are not used in section 57 but the overall meaning of section 57 is also to the same effect that the expenditure ought to be incurred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) only assumed that some funds might have been used by the assessee for some other purposes. The department has been consistently accepting the claim in earlier years and in subsequent years. It appears that in the beginning, assessee has more income under the head income from other sources as than the interest expenditure, but in Assessment Year 2007-07, 2007-08 and 2009-10, the interest expenditure was more than income, in spite of that loss under the hea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version