Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Inglobe Exports, Mumbai. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Il

Condonation of delay in filing revision application - Availing duty drawback while getting rabte/ refund of duty paid on export of goods - Applicants submit that the exporters are eligible for "Duty Drawback" on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods if the same is covered in the Customs & Central Excise Duty Drawback Rules 1995 at the rate prescribed in the drawback schedule. They are also eligible for "Rebate of duty paid on the final products" as these are the two sets of incentives c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntion that as they had posted the application on the last day of the stipulated 3 months period, no condonation of delay is required. The applicant has also failed to give any documentary evidences to justify that there were sufficient cause, which prevented them from filing Revision Application in stipulated time in support of their claim for the delay in filing of the Revision Application. - Revision application rejected - Decided against the applicant. - F.NO. 195/595/12-RA - ORDER NO. 60/201 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ith Notification No.19/2004-CE(NT) dated 06.09.2004. The rebate was allowed to the applicant. 3. Being aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original, department filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), on the ground that as the applicant has availed drawback, allowing rebate will amount to double benefit, which is not allowed. Commissioner (Appeals) allowed department's appeal. 4. Being aggrieved by the impugned Order-in-Appeal, the applicant has filed this Revision Application under Section 35 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y paid on the final products" simultaneously. This view is not supported by any legal submission. Applicants submit that the exporters are eligible for "Duty Drawback" on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods if the same is covered in the Customs & Central Excise Duty Drawback Rules 1995 at the rate prescribed in the drawback schedule. They are also eligible for "Rebate of duty paid on the final products" as these are the two sets of incentives covered under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

' in rejecting the rebate claim, which is legally not sustainable and therefore, order is liable to be quashed & set aside. 4.2 It is very clear from the condition (6) of Notification No.84/2010-Cus(NT) dated 17.09.2010 that where the rate shown is same, it shall mean that the same relates to only customs component and the rebate is available irrespective of whether the exporter has availed of Cenvat or not. Commissioner simply brushed aside this submission stating that the judgement of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was also decided by Reversionary Authority in the case of Benny Impex Pvt Ltd-2003(154) ELT 300(GOI). 4.5 Applicants submit that the Asstt. Commissioner had passed subsequent claims filed by the applicants and all other assesses. However only this claim was rejected without recording any cogent findings and merely stating that it is for the applicants to prove that the statement submitted are correct. Applicant submits authorities are not following the consistent system of passing the rebate as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on Application was dispatched on 09.06.2012, which was well within 3 months and hence condonation of delay is not applicable. 6. Personal hearing scheduled in this case on 08.07.2015, 05.08.2015 and 02.09.2015. Hearing held on 02.09.2015 was attended by Shri P.K. Shetty, Advocate on behalf of the applicant, who reiterated the grounds of revision application. The Department vide their written reply dated 31.08.2015 mainly reiterated contents of impugned Order-in-Appeal. 7. Government has carefull .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entioned in para (4) above. 9. At the outset, Government observes that the Revision Application has been filed beyond stipulated period of three months. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was received by the applicant on 15.03.2012 and the Revision Application was filed on 28.06.2012. The applicant was required to file Application for condonation of delay. The applicant has submitted that the impugned Order-in-Appeal was received by them on 15.03.2012. The revision application against the said order w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the applicant of the order against which the Application is being made: Provided that the Central Government may; If it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the Application within the aforesaid period of three months, allow it to be presented within a further period of three months. " Further Rule 10(2) of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 provides as under: "The Revision Application sent by registered post under sub-rule (1) shall be d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

News: Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters

News: Clarification about Transition Credit

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer

Notification: Exempts inter-state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 09/2017-IT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 08/2017-IT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version