Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (7) TMI 1109 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (7) TMI 1109 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Impact of subsequent decision of Apex Court on the matter already concluded - Cenvat Credit - capital goods used in the mines - Held that:- it was held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that after the proceedings had attained finality and have not been challenged before the higher authorities, the benefit cannot be extended to that particular assessee in view of a subsequent decision by the Supreme Court. Otherwise also we find that the issue is no more re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- Excise Appeal No. 3056 of 2007 - FINAL ORDER NO . 52158/2016 - Dated:- 14-6-2016 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) and Mr. V Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri Yogesh Agarwal, AR for the Appellants Shri B L Narasimhan, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed the present appeal. 2. After hearing both the sides, duly represented by Shri Yogesh Agarwal, learned DR appearing for the Revenue and Shri B L Narasimhan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spondent has appropriated said deposits / reversal made by the assessee. 3. It seems that the said order of the Commissioner was not challenged by the assessee before the Higher Appellate forum. In the meanwhile, identical disputes in the case of other assesses reached the Hon ble Supreme Court wherein the present respondent also joined hands and as per the final decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court, the cement manufacturer are entitled to avail cenvat credit of duty paid on the capital goods u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mmissioner of Central Excise. The said order of the Commissioner was not put to challenge by the assessee at any point of time and as such, attained finality. On the said ground, original adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim. 5. On appeal against the said order, the Commissioner (Appeals) observed that inasmuch as the assessee was also a party to the petition filed before the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Vikram Cement, it has to be held that the matter was taken up by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version