2016 (7) TMI 1153

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the period 2008-10. - Held that:- the impugned order dated 15th March 2016 of the CESTAT is modified and it is directed that in view of the Appellant having already deposited ₹ 9.32 lakhs and having further deposited ₹ 5.77 lakhs on 16th May 2016, there will be no requirement for the Appellant to make any further payment by way of pre-deposit in terms of the impugned order of the CEST .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant that credit should be given to the sum of ₹ 9.23 lakhs already deposited by Appellant along with the returns in Form ST-3 for the period 2008-10. 4. The Appellant has placed on record the copies of the returns filed for the said period along with Challans showing payment of tax. Thus the payment of ₹ 9.23lakhs is sought to be correlated to the period in question for which the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X