Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Asahi India Glass Ltd. Versus CCE, Gurgaon-II

2016 (7) TMI 1171 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

Input service credit on the activity of unloading and shifting the goods in the premises of the buyer denied - Held that:- As per purchase order, the appellant was required to supply the goods at the premises of M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. These facts are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant for unloading and shifting the goods in the godown of M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. are entitled to input service credit. Therefore appellant has correctly availed cenvat credit on the activity of unloading and shifting of the godown of the go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s in appeal against the impugned order wherein input service credit on the activity of unloading and shifting the goods in the premises of the buyer was sought to be denied by way of impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f buyer and took the service on contractor for unloading of the said goods and shifting in the godown M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. The revenue of the view that unloading and shifting of the godown of Maruti Udyog Ltd. is not an activity related to the sale .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was also imposed. Aggrieved from the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant is submit that as per the purchase order, the appellant is required to supply the goods at the premises of Maruti Udyog Ltd. and unload .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is entitled to input service credit on the said activity. 4. On the other hand the Ld. AR opposed the contention of the Ld. Counsel submits that these services have been availed by the appellant beyond the that place of removal. Therefore, they are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version