New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (8) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Valuation - appellants carrying out job work on the goods received from the principal manufacturer and after carrying out the carban lining the same were returned to the principal manufacturer. - tribunal has granted stay - demand for the subsequent period raised on the similar issue - Held that:- The show cause notices, dated 05.06.2015 and 26.10.2015, issued by the first respondent shall be kept in abeyance, till the disposal of the Appeals filed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this Writ Petition, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the first respondent to keep the issue in call book and in abeyance of passing final orders of the statement of demands, dated 05.06.2015 and 26.10.2015 till the disposal of the petitioner's Appeals in E/41640/14 and E/41641/14, pending before the second respondent-Tribunal. 2. The reasons for seeking for the aforesaid prayer are as follows:- i) On the same issue, in respect of the earlier period, i.e., from 1.04.2008 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the total demand. Insofar as applications, seeking for early hearing of the Appeals are concerned, the same were dismissed. At this stage, it would be relevant to quote the operative portion of the order passed by the Tribunal, which reads as follows:- After considering the submissions of both sides, we find that there is no dispute on the fact that appellants carrying out job work on the goods received from the principal manufacturer and after carrying out the carban lining the same were ret .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le 10 (a) would not apply to job worker, who has completed job work and returned to the principal manufacturer. Revenue has not disputed the procedure followed by the principal manufacturer. The only dispute is the appellant discharged duty on the value addition. Therefore, in view of Tribunal decision referred above, prima facie, appellants have made out a case for waiver of total demand. Accordingly, there will be waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery during pendency of Appeal. Stay Applic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version