TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 17X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of slums in the state of Tamil Nadu. - Held that:- .In my view, repeatedly issuing demands to the petitioner and enforcing the same would only result in the multiplicity of the proceedings which should be avoided. More particularly, when the petitioner Board has challenged the constitutional validity of the very charging provisions and the earlier demands issued from the year 2012 are also under ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and with the consent of either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner is the Tamil Nadu slum Clearance Board which is a statutory body established under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Slum Areas (Improvement Clearance) Act, 1971, an Act to provide for improvement and clearance of slums in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is stated that other connected writ petitions are also pending. 4.The petitioner's primary defence appears to be that they are a statutory body incorporated under the Tamil Nadu Act 11 of 1971 and it is a State within the meaning of Article 12 of Constitution of India, a non-profitable body corporate incorporated to implement the directive principles of state policy enshrined under part ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mil Nadu and the Board neither declares dividends not has any share holders. 5.In my view, repeatedly issuing demands to the petitioner and enforcing the same would only result in the multiplicity of the proceedings which should be avoided. More particularly, when the petitioner Board has challenged the constitutional validity of the very charging provisions and the earlier demands issued from ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
