GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 102 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2016 (8) TMI 102 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - TMI - Bogus expenditure - allowance of depreciation - whether regular assessment require fresh investigation and finding although the fact remain that the purchase of plant and machinery was already established as bogus in the Block Assessment ? - Held that:- Regular assessment of the assessment year 2000-01 was completed under section 143(3), in which the aforesaid purchases of ₹ 3,14,47,344/- were not held to be bogus and depreciation of such purc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d:- 20-7-2016 - Girish Chandra Gupta And Arindam Sinha, JJ. For the Appellant : Md.Nizamuddin, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.R.N.Bajoria, Mr.Akhilesh Gupta, Malay Dhar, Mr.A.K.Dey, Advocates ORDER The Court : The subject matter of challenge is a judgment and order dated 24th October, 2008 by which the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Kolkata in ITA No. 1071/Kol/2007, pertaining to the assessment year 2001-02, dismissed an appeal preferred by the revenue. The aggrieved revenue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vocate appearing for the appellant, was unable to show that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal arrived at a conclusion that regular assessment require fresh investigation . Such a conclusion was not shown to us to have been arrived at by the learned Tribunal in the impugned judgment. It is true that such an observation was made by the CIT(A) while partly allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee. The subject matter of challenge before us is the order of the Tribunal and not that of the CIT(A) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ompilation by the A.R. The material facts in this case are not in dispute and it is not disputed that the respondent company has capitalized the entire amount in the books of account for the purchase of the capital goods worth ₹ 92,82,90,609/-. It is also not disputed that the respondent company has not claimed any depreciation or any other deduction till the date of search except depreciation of ₹ 58,05,918/- for Asst. Year 2000-01 on ₹ 3,14,47,344/- capitalized in the books o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessment for which reliance has been placed on the various decisions mentioned supra by the Ld.AR. With regard to the claim of depreciation allowed on the alleged bogus purchases worth ₹ 3,14,47,344/- for the year 2000-01, we hold that no addition could have been made in the block assessment as no incriminating documents were found in respect of such purchases. The survey proceedings were carried out at post-search and it was not related to the seized material from the premises of the res .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ross-examine the parties from whom the purchase of capital goods worth ₹ 3,14,47,344/- was made and depreciation to the extent of ₹ 58,05,918/- was allowed to the company for the Asst. Year 2000-01. Since no incriminating material was found in the course of search, indicating fictitious purchase of capital goods worth ₹ 3,14,47,344/-, no addition can be made in Block Assessment. However, the Assessing Officer may consider the same while completing assessment/reassessment of tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h ₹ 3,14,47,344/- was bogus. Moreover, the depreciation of ₹ 58,05,918/- claimed on the purchases of ₹ 3,14,47,344/- was not disallowed, meaning thereby in the regular assessment in the assessment year 2000-01 the Revenue accepted the genuineness of the assets purchased during the said year and also allowed depreciation thereon. In the assessment year under consideration, the A.O. has disallowed depreciation claimed on the WDV of such assets which were purchased during assessme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version