New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (8) TMI 105 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Revision u/s 263 - whether AO failed to make detailed inquiry with respect to issue of capital gain - Held that:- From the record we can see that the Assessing Officer had examined entire transaction including from the point of view of the confirming party receiving considerable portion of the sale proceeds. This is not a case where the Assessing Officer failed to enquire into the transaction at all. Further, the Revenue has not brought anything on r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ransaction and seek to tax the difference in the hands of the assessee. - TAX APPEAL NO. 584 of 2016 - Dated:- 25-7-2016 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. A.J. SHASTRI, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Revenue has challenged judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19.02.2016 raising following question for our consideration: Whether the Appellate Tribunal has substantially erred in quashing the order of revision pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; 3.69 crores was paid to one Genus Commu Trade Pvt Ltd. being a confirming party. 3. The issue of taxing the assessee for capital gain on such sale came-up during the course of scrutiny assessment for the assessee's return for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer, after raising various queries with respect to the said sale transaction, accepted the assessee's stand and computed the capital gain after giving benefit of permissible deductions considering the sale proceed of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rade Pvt Ltd. dated 23.11.2009 and the Assessing Officer, therefore, should have made detailed inquires which he failed. CIT (Appeals) was therefore of the opinion that the order of the Assessing Officer was erroneous and also prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. He, therefore, set aside the assessment and directed the Assessing Officer to carry out fresh assessment after proper inquires. 5. The assessee challenged this order before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by the impugned judgement, a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income. 8. As regard investment of ₹ 1,49,45,664/- it is stated that it is a amount of last year investment there was no new investment made during the year and no amount shown as a investment as on 31.03.2010 balance sheet. 7. The Tribunal was, therefore, of the opinion that the Assessing Officer had raised specific queries which were also replied specifically by the assessee. Thus, this was not a case where the inquires were caused by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner, therefore, c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version