Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 183 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (8) TMI 183 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (340) E.L.T. 603 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Import of goods against DEEC license - Denial of benefit of Notification No. 203/92-Cus - The benefit of said notification was sought to be denied on the ground that the goods exported for procuring the said license were manufactured by availing the benefit of input stage credit. Clause (V)(a) of Notification No. 203/92-Cus prohibited availment of input stage credit in respect of such goods. - Held that:- even if the thir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e same is to be proved by that person. However, in this case, there is a specific declaration by the appellant that they have followed the conditions of the notification which include that the goods exported have not been availed the input stage credit. The appellants have failed to substitute the said declaration by providing evidence. - Demand confirmed with interest - However, penalty u/s 114A set aside - Decided partly in favor of assessee. - Appeal No. C/797/04 - A/88905/16/SMB - Dated: .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

us prohibited availment of input stage credit in respect of such goods. The show-cause notice did not contain any evidence to show that input credit cannot be availed in respect of the exports. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant argued that they have not availed the credit and third party exporters M/s Virchow Drugs Pvt. Ltd. may or may not have availed the credit. He argued that it was the responsibility of Revenue to produce evidence that credit has been availed by M/s Virchow Drugs Pvt. Ltd .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Government. In these circumstances, he argued that the extended period could not have been invoked in this case. 3. Learned AR relied on the impugned order. 4. I have gone through the rival submissions. I find that condition (V)(a) of the Notification No. 203/92 read as under: - No input stage credit is obtained under rule 56A or 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. I find that even if the third party exporter had availed input stage credit, the benefit of Notification No. 203/92 cannot be av .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version