Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Vachan Foams Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Dibrugarh

Classification - Goods manufactured by the appellant made of plastic availing exemption under notification no.33/99-CE – appellate authority rejected claim contending goods falling under excise tariff heading 39.01 to 39.14 to be plastic material and claims appellant goods not to be plastic material falling under tariff heading 39.22 and 39.26 – Held that:– Chapter Notes/Section Notes given under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 cannot be made applicable to interpret an entry contained in an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on – decided in favor of assessee. - Appeal No. E/179/2008 - ORDER NO.FO/A/75707/16 - Dated:- 1-8-2016 - Shri H. K. Thakur, Member (Technical) And Shri P.K.Choudhary, Member (Judicial) Shri Devraj Sahu, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S.S.Chattopadhyay, Suptd.(AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri H. K.Thakur 1. This Appeal have been filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No. 07/DB/CE(A)/GHY/08 dated 18.01.2008 passed by the Commissioner(Appeals), Guwahati. 2. Sri Devaraj Sahu (Advocate) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der Central Excise Tariff Heading 39.22 and 39.26 are not made of plastic as the definition of plastic given in Chapter Note 1 of Chapter 39 only considers those materials which are falling under Central Excise Tariff Heading 3901 to 3914 to be the plastic material. 4. Ld. Advocate relied upon C.B.E.& C s Circular No.10/89 dated 10.02.1989 issued by C.B.E.C. He made the bench go through paragraph-4 of this circular and argued that only regular geometric shapes will be considered classifiable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efinition given in the Chapter Notes or Section Notes of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 cannot be invoked when no tariff heading is specified in the exemption notification. Ld. Advocate relied upon the case law of Kurlon Ltd. vs.- Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I[2014(308) E.L.T. 155(Tri.-Del.)]. Ld. Advocate argued that in this case also the product manufactured by Kurlon Ltd. was falling under 39.21 of the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 and it was held by the CESTAT, Delhi that App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r passed by the First Appellate Authority. 6. Heard both sides and perused the case records. 7. The issue involved in the present case is whether the goods manufactured by the Appellant will be products of plastic or not. Sl.No.13 of the table annexed to Notification No. 33/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 reads as follows: 13. Gas based Intermediate products (i) Gas exploration and Production (ii) Gas Distribution and Bottling (iii) Power Generation (iv) Plastics (v) Yarn Raw Materials (vi) Fertilizers ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Updates     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version