New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 201 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2016 (8) TMI 201 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - TMI - Cenvat Credit - 100% EOU - Reversal of cenvat credit availed on inputs removed from the factory as such against CT-3 certificate – Rule 3(4) of the erstwhile Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 - Held that:- The Hon’ble High court of Karnataka in the case of CCE Bangalore Vs. Solectron Centum Electronics Ltd. [2014 (10) TMI 596 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] has observed that, "there was no duty payable, as the said inputs were removed with the previous permission of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa: The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of fiber reinforced products and were claiming the benefit of Cenvat Credit on duty paid on the inputs. After availing the Credit in respect of unsaturated polyester raisin and S.K.Jain Hardware, they cleared the said inputs against CT-3 certificate issued to one M/s. Ercon Composites, a 100% EOU. 2. The dispute in the present appeal relates to as to whether while clearing the said inputs against CT-3 certificates the appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st CT-3 certificate the duty stands debited by them in bond equal to the duty amount. They have further contended that such clearances have to be treated as export of goods, in which case they would be entitled to the Cenvat Credit. They referred to the various decisions of the Tribunal laying down that clearances to 100% EOU are to be treated as export clearances, in view of the law laid down by the Larger Bench of the of the Tribunal in the case of Amitex Silk Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE reported a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ich allowed the 100% EOU to obtain final products from the other manufacturers free of duty on the basis of CT-3 certificates. Revenue s contention is that the goods do not stand procured directly from the input manufacturer and as such benefit of notification was not available to 100% EOU. However, we find that the said dispute has been the subject matter of the various decisions. The Hon ble High court of Karnataka in the case of CCE Bangalore Vs. Solectron Centum Electronics Ltd. 2014 (309) E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment as reflected in CT-3. There was no liability to pay the duty and already Cenvat Credit has been taken, it was reversed under protest and therefore, they were entitled to the refund of the said amount. That question is also answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 6. The said decision of the Hon ble High Court of Karnataka stands followed by the Tribunal in the case of CCE Hyderabad Vs. Matrix Laboratories Ltd. 2015 (330) ELT 523 (Tri-Bang). While dealing with the identic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version