Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri K. Venkatesh Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (4) , Bangalore

Computation of net income - return of income filed by the assessee was accompanied by the report of an accountant u/s.44AB - Held that:- Following the decision CIT v. Balchand Ajit Kumar (2003 (4) TMI 76 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court ) and CIT v. Hariram Bhambhani (2015 (2) TMI 907 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ), it is of the view that the lower authorities ought to have determined the net income of the assessee on the basis of net profit earned by the assessee and ought to have adopted the net profit @ 5. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the year under appeal reporting an income of ₹ 3,08,770/-. It is submitted that the return of income filed by the assessee was accompanied by the report of an accountant u/s.44AB of the Act. The total revenue or turnover shown for the year under appeal was ₹ 53,27,417/- and ultimately, the assessee had shown a net income of ₹ 3,08,770/- which works out to 5.80% of the gross receipts. 3. It was submitted that there were payments made by the assessee s clients directly to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

counts by the assessee for the year under appeal was ₹ 40,79,790/-. It was submitted before A.O. that the omission to show the aforesaid receipts of ₹ 40,79,790/- does not distort the correct income of the assessee in as much as, to the extent of such receipts, the related expenditure on the payment made to security guards is also not claimed as deduction. However, the learned AO did not appreciate the foresaid contentions and explanation and while completing the original assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e proceeded to hold that the Gross Profit (GP) reckoned at 38,98% of the receipts (as shown by the assessee in his account) requires to be assessed in place of addition of ₹ 40,79,790/-. Accordingly, the CIT(A) modified the addition to ₹ 15,80,302/- and determined the income of the assessee at ₹ 18,89,072/-. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT in ITA No.712/Bang/2010. It is submitted that the Department accepted the order of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d that the contention of the assessee with regard to lack of sufficient opportunity has been rightly rejected by the CIT(A) after thoroughly examining the records of the assessment proceedings. As regards the other grounds, we find that the contention of the assessee that some times, the agency/contractors have paid the wages directly to the guards is not disputed and has been found to be in favour of the assessee. In such a case, the entire receipts cannot be said to be the income of the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

we direct the AO to take into consideration the totality of facts into consideration the totality of facts income consideration and compute the net income of the assessee. 7. In the set aside proceedings, the AO called for certain details from the assessee. After consideration of the details filed by the assessee, the AO determined the income of the assessee by the impugned order dated 30.3.2013, at ₹ 18,89,072/- based on the extent of income sustained by the CIT(A) in the first round. 8. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the ITAT had observed that the mere allowance of wages and direct expenses was not enough. Thus the basis on which the learned CIT(A) has proceeded to estimate the income of the assessee has not been approved by the ITAT and therefore, the AO ought not to have determined the income on that basis, especially as the assessee had not claimed any expenses in respect of these receipts, which, if reckoned, would mean that the income shown by the assessee was capable to being accepted. The assessee su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

observed that there is no dispute in the fact that the total receipt of ₹ 40,79,790/- has not been accounted for in the turnover by the assessee. The CIT(A) in his order dated 16.02.2010 has given a relief of ₹ 24,99,488/- after considering the fact that the assessee must have incurred ESI, PF etc. At the same time, the contention of the assessee that there are circumstances that agency / contractor has to incur other expenses for the purpose of carrying on the business, it is likel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ₹ 40,79,790/- can be allowed as additional expenses. Accordingly, the assessee was granted a relief of ₹ 1,70,535/-. 10. Aggrieved by the above order of CIT(Appeals), the assessee is in appeal before me on the following grounds:- 1. The orders of the authorities below in so far as it is against the appellant are opposed to law, equity, weight of evidence, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned CIT[A] is not justified in modifying the original addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erefore, the addition sustained by the learned CIT[A] is highly excessive and unreasonable under the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant's case. 4. Without prejudice to the right to seek waiver with the Hon'ble CCIT/DG, the appellant denies himself liable to be charged to interest u/s. 234-B and 234-D of the Act, which under the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant's case deserves to be cancelled. 5. For the above and other grounds that may be urged at the time .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Balchand Ajit Kumar, 263 ITR 610 (MP), wherein it was held that the total sale could not be regarded as profit of the assessee. The net profit rate had to be adopted and once it was adopted, it could not be said that there was perversity of approach. 12. The ld. counsel for the assessee also relied on the decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Hariram Bhambhani, ITA No.313 of 2013 dated 4.2.2015, wherein the Hon ble High Court considered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards - Tenure of the NACAS extended from one year to two years

Notification: National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force - "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary"

Highlight: Restriction on number of layers for certain classes of holding companies - More than two layers of subsidiaries not allowed subject to certain exceptions.

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version