New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 241 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

2016 (8) TMI 241 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD - TMI - Cenvat credit reversal - refund - 100% EOU same issues raised by subsequent SCN. - Held that: - subsequent SCN is bad in law being repeat litigation of the issue already covered by the earlier SCN. The allegations brought forward by earlier SCN was not brought on record as a result of such investigation by subsequent SCN - impugned order set aside decided in favor of appellant. - S.T. Appeal No. 50591/15 - Final Order No. 70339/2016 - Dated:- 1-1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Act. 2. The brief facts are that the appellant, a 100% EOU, is registered with the service tax Department for providing taxable services being "Business Auxiliary Services", "Information Technology Software Services", "Online Information and Data Retrival Services", "Scientific and Technical Consultancy" & "Maintenance and Repair Services" et cetera. The appellant availed Cenvat credit on inputs and input services received. As the appell .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

services received from one M/s Chanson Motors (P) Ltd. provided under rent-a-cab Service, on the observation of the revenue, that some inquiry was pending against the said M/s Chanson Motors (P) Ltd. as regards the registration status and the collection and deposit of service tax with the Central Exchequer. In order to get the refund expeditiously, the appellant agreed to reverse the Cenvat credit with respect to invoices of M/s Chanson India Motors (P) Ltd. and thereafter, the refund was allow .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ave reversed the credit on 5/1/2011. The show cause notice dated 19/3/2013 proposed to disallow the Cenvat credit of ₹ 1,56,334/- under Rule 14. It was further proposal to appropriate the same from the deposit made on 5/1/2011 along with interest and penalty was also proposed under Rule 15. The appellant on receipt of the show cause notice filed reply dated 12/6/13 wherein they specifically mentioned that RUD-I mentioned in the show cause notice, was not served on them as the same was not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version