Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 246 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

2016 (8) TMI 246 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH - TMI - Recovery demand valuation - includibility of value of free supply in gross amount charged - Held that: - The value of goods and materials supplied free of cost by a service recipient to the provider of the taxable construction service, being neither monetary or non-monetary consideration paid by or flowing from the service recipient, accruing to the benefit of service provider, would be outside the taxable value or the gross amount charged. - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2013 in Appeal No. ST/60388/2013 - Stay Order No. 60095/2016 - Dated:- 27-5-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Raju, Member (Technical) Present for the Appellant : Shri J.K. Mittal, Advocate Present for the Respondent : Shri Sanjay Jain, AR ORDER This stay application has been filed by M/s.P.S. Construction seeking to stay recovery of dues of service tax confirmed amounting to ₹ 2,02,74,083/- and equivalent penalty imposed. The demand has been raised on the ground that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation on 8.2.2010 whereas the impugned order held that the appellants were registered much before that and had in fact been filing the returns for the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. He argued that they have paid service tax during the period amounting to ₹ 24,11,299/- and ₹ 88,123/-respectively. He argued that in view of the fact that the sole allegation in the notice relating to the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 has not been upheld and the demand cannot be confirmed for the said period. He .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot covered within the scope of commercial and industrial construction service. 3. Learned AR argued that the appellants were involved in the construction of residential complex at the appellants' site which cannot be considered as dams. He also argued that the appellants are engaged in the construction related to the activity in the power house and that too is outside the ambit of service tax net. He relied on the circular No.B1/16/2007-TRU dated 22.5.2005 to assert that if the value of free .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version