Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Bangalore Cables P. Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

2017 (347) E.L.T. 100 (Tri. - Bang.) - Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - closure of factory - due to suffering heavy losses, the appellants stopped their production - surrender of registration certificate - Held that:- in view of the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Union of India V. Slovak Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. [2006 (7)9 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] which was affirmed by Supreme Court in [2007 (1)556 - SUPREME COURT], there is no express prohibition in terms of Rule 5. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r S. S. Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order passed by learned Commissioner vide its order dated 24.4.2008 vide which the appellant s appeal was dismissed by upholding the Order-in-Original. Brief facts of the present case are that the appellant is a private limited company registered under Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the manufacture of ACSR conductors. Owing to lack of business for their excisable products and due to suffering heavy losses, the appellants sto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r appellant was issued a show-cause notice wherein the Department proposed to deny the CENVAT credit on the surrendering the registration certificate, as there was no provision in the Central Excise law for refund of lapsed credit. Thereafter the adjudicating authority rejected the refund claim of the appellant and aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (A) who upheld the order of the lower authority on the ground that the CENVAT credit scheme is not a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ce with law and the judgments of the various judicial fora. In support of his submissions, the learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the following decisions: a) Union of India V. Slovak Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. 2006 (201) E.L.T. 559 (Kar.) affirmed in 2008 (223) E.L.T. A170 (SC) b) CCE V. Apex Drugs & Intermediaries Ltd. 2015 (322) E.L.T. 834 (A.P) c) CCE V. Apex Drugs & Intermediaries Ltd. 2014 (314) E.L.T. 729 (Tri.-Bang.) d) CCE V. Jain Vanguard Polybutlene Ltd. 2010 (256) E.L.T. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal is right in ordering for refund even if there is no provision in Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2002, to refund the unutilized credit? b) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal is right in ordering for refund even if there is no production and there is no clearance of finished goods? c) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal is right in holding that respondent is entitled for refund even if .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that various case laws in which similar claims were allowed. The Tribunal, in our view, is fully justified in ordering refund particularly in the light of the closure of the factory and in the light of the assessee coming out of the Modvat Scheme. In these circumstances, we answer all the three questions as framed in para 17 against the Revenue and in favour the assessee. 2.1. The learned counsel further submitted that the question whether the cash refund is allowable on cenvat credit balance ly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t. The learned counsel further submitted that the judgments of the Karnataka High Court which was affirmed by the Supreme Court has been relied upon in the case of CCE, Hyderabad Vs. Apex Drugs & Intermediates Ltd. reported in 2014 (314) E.L.T. 729 and the same has been affirmed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2015 (322) E.L.T. 834 and has also been followed by the Bombay Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Century Rayon Twisting Unit Vs. CCE, Thane-I reported in 2015 (325) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the appellant, the unutilized cenvat credit would lapse and in support of his submission he relied upon the following authorities: a) Purvi Fabrics & Texturise (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur-II 2004 (172) E.L.T. 321 (Tri.-Del.) b) Purvi Fabrics & Texturise (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur-II 2015 (319) E.L.T. 551 (S.C) c) Modipon Ltd. Vs. CCE, Ghaziabad 2015 (324) E.L.T. 718 (Tri.-Del.) d) Nav Durga Steel Products Vs. CCE, Chandigarh 2014 (309) E.L.T. 302 (Tri.-Del.) e) Steel Strips Vs. CCE, Ludhia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed in the intermediate product cleared for export, or used in providing output service which is exported, the cenvat credit in respect of the input or input service so used shall be allowed to be utilized by the manufacturer or provider of output service towards payment of, (i) Duty of excise on any final product cleared for home consumption or for export on payment of duty, or (ii) Service tax on output service, and where for any reason such adjustment is not possible, the manufacturer or the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version