Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle I, Coimbatore Versus M/s. Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd.

Reopening of assessment - reasons to believe - excessive claim of the assessee - depreciation set-off - Held that:- The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer clearly speak for the under assessment of tax hence, the conditions laid above stand fulfilled in so far as re-assessment proceedings are concerned. - In the present case, on framing the assessment order of Maheswari Sugars Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07 vide order dated 25.03.2008, it came to the knowledge of the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not produced anything before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to show as to how this fact was fully and truly disclosed before the assessing authority and that there was not failure on the part of assessee. Hence, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wrongly cancelled the assessment order. It is fully covered by the provisions of Explanation 1 to Section 147 of the Income Tax Act - It is possible that with due diligence the Assessing Officer would have ascertained this fat at the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Coimbatore, dated 26.05.2015 relevant to the assessment year 2007-08. The grievance of the Revenue in this appeal is with regard to quashing of reassessment order by the ld. CIT(A) by observing that there was no tangible fresh material in the hands of the Assessing Officer to believe that the income has escaped assessment and reopening is bad in law. 2. The facts of the case are that the or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Limited, the assessee, herein, pursuant trot he order issued by the High Court of Judicature at Madras which was effective from 01.01.2007. In this background, the Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Act on 21.03.2013 by recording reasons for reopening of assessment as follows: Hence, it needs to be verified whether as losses amalgamating company has been taken into account for the purpose of valuation. It needs verification whether the assessee company has actually carri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its account for the financial year 2006-07. According to the Assessing Officer, in the assessment order dated 25.03.2008 in the case of Maheswara Sugars Limited for the assessment year 2006-07, it was limited to the statement that the assessee was not in operation for five years before taking over by Bannari Amman Group on 07.02. 2006. In the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act dated 29.12.2009 in the case of Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. for the assessment year 2007-08, there was no m .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 31.03.2014 in the case of Maheswara Sugars Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07 the depreciation pertaining to the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 amounting to ₹.6,98,05,670/- out of total brought forward losses amounting to ₹.23,73,98,026/- that was brought forward for set off against the assessment year 2006-07 was disallowed for the following reasons: a. The assessee themselves conceded that the company was not in operation for the previous three years prior to AY 2005-06 an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een committed by the Assessing Officer, reopening of assessment is legally permissible . In the light of the above decision of the Apex Court of the land, the slew of decisions cited by the assessee becomes irrelevant. 4. Accordingly, while framing the assessment order, the books of account of M/s. Maheswara Sugars Ltd. and the assessee company and the Annual Reports for the relevant years were examined and found that the conditions stipulated in section 72A and Rule 9C of the I.T. Rules have be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o ₹.6,98,05,670/- would be reduced as determined in the assessment order in the case of Maheswara Sugar Mills Ltd. for assessment year 2006-07 and only losses amounting to ₹.16,10,19,160/- are allowed to be carried forward for set off against the assessee s current income. 5. Against this, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) placed judgement in the case of Usha International Ltd. 348 ITR 485 (Del)(FB) and the decision of the Hon ble Apex Co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n findings on merits. The ld. DR relied on the assessment order and also judgement of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. PVS Beedies Pvt. Ltd. (supra). According to him, while going through the reassessment order of Maheswara Sugars Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07, it came to know that depreciation pertaining to the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 amounting to ₹.6,98,05,670/-, out of total brought forward losses amounting to ₹.23,73,98,026/- that was brought for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de use of the material in the form of the assessment order of Maheswara Sugars Limited for the assessment year 2006-07 to reopen the assessment and it cannot be used since that assessment order is bad in law. The ld. AR has further relied on the decision of the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of SPIC Infotainment Ltd. v. CIT 247 CTR 500. According to the ld. AR, the reopening of assessment is bad in law since in this case, there is no fresh tangible material and the Assessing Officer cannot .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been issued beyond four years from the end of relevant assessment year and against the assessee had brought all material facts in the return filed, the reopening on the basis of same set of facts is bad in law and it is only change of opinion. It is a settled law that on the basis of material, prima facie, available before the Assessing Officer, he was of the opinion that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment can be formed. The word reason in the phrase reason to believe would mean ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l evidence. In the given case, original assessment was completed on 29.12.2009. The reason was recorded as discussed above. The argument of the ld.AR is that u/s 147, in case the assessment order is completed u/s 143(3), as has been done in this case, no action could be taken after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the assessee has failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment for that assessment year, inter alia. 10 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under, he has to record reasons that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment . It is also mandated by section 148(2) to record reasons in writing. The reassessment proceedings u/s 147 are further subject to sections 148,149,150,151,152 and 153. But in the present case, we are required to decide the limited issue regarding the validity of proceedings undertaken after four years of the assessment year in question. The Assessing Officer is required to see if the conditions laid in Explanati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing Officer clearly speak for the under assessment of tax hence, the conditions laid above stand fulfilled in so far as re-assessment proceedings are concerned. In so far as the reasons recorded, extracted in the above portion of this order, we are satisfied that the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. This fact confers jurisdiction on him to reopen the assessment. The power to re-assess post 1st April, 1989 are much wider than these used to be before. But .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reassessment, as stated above, has to be based on fulfillment of certain pre-conditions but the concept change of opinion has to be taken into consideration otherwise it may give unbridled power to an Assessing Officer to reopen any and every assessment order which would simply amount to a review. The concept change of opinion is an in-built test to check the abuse of power by the Assessing Officer. So, now only when the Assessing Officer has a tangible material to base his conclusion that there .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ears from the end of the relevant assessment year unless any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for such assessment year by the reason of the failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment for that assessment year. There are two other conditions which are not relevant for deciding the legal issue under appeal. We have to see as to what failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts signify. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sri Krishna Pvt. Ltd etc vs ITO & Others, 221 ITR 538. The words omission or failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment for that year postulates a failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment. What facts are material and necessary for assessment will differ from case to case. The material should not only be full but also be true. If some mater .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Maheswari Sugars Ltd. for the assessment year 2006-07 vide order dated 25.03.2008, it came to the knowledge of the Assessing Officer that the depreciation pertaining to the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 amounting to ₹.6,98,05,670/- was already set off out of total brought forward loss amounting to ₹.23,73,98,026/- and the balance amount of ₹.16,10,19,160/- could be carried forward for set off against the assessee s current income. As per Explanation 2 of Section147 it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version