Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad Versus M/s Rana Travels and Tours

2016 (8) TMI 402 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

Tour operator service – demand - tourist vehicle – service provided during the period April, 2001 to March, 2006 - amendment in definition of tourist vehicle by Finance Act, 2004 – definition post 2004 taken into consideration – Held that: - The issue for the period after 05.02.2004 is to be decided. The case law relied upon by learned departmental representative is before the amendment of definition of tour operator in the Finance Act, 2004. Therefore, the said case law does not squarely cover .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

RDER Present appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 6/ST/ALLD/2009 dated 16/02/2009. 2. M/s Rana Travels and Tours were providing bus for transportation of employees of M/s IFFCO between Allahabad and Phoolpur during the period from April, 2001 to March, 2006. It appeared to revenue that M/s Rana Travels and Tours have provided Tour Operator Service. Therefore, a show cause notice cum demand notice was issued to them raising a demand of ₹ 7,05,559/- of Service Tax for a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. M/s Rana Travels and Tours preferred an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) against the said Order-in-Original. Learned Commissioner (Appeals) decided the appeal through the impugned Order-in-Appeal No. 6/ST/ALLD/2009 dated 16/02/2009 wherein he has taken into consideration the provisions of law post 05.02.2004 period and held that it is not on record that journeys were performed in the tourist vehicles and that a tourist vehicle must confirmed to the spec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

spondent were operating tour in tourist vehicles. The respondent filed their cross objections and relied upon case laws in the case of:- [i] Tamilnadu state transport Corporation Ltd v/s Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai 2007(6) STR 322[Trib] [ii] Gatulal V. Patel V/s Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara-II 2007[7] STR 462[Trib.] [iii] Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Vadodara-II v/s Gandhi Travels 2007[6] STR 430 [Trib.] [iv] Gaytri Enterprises 2007[6] STR 280 [Commission .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version