Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Srinivas Sashidhar Chaganty, Hyderabad Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (1) , Hyderabad.

Addition u/s 68 - undisclosed cash credits and investments - Held that:- Most of the withdrawals from the Bank of Baroda and other banks were held to be available for investment in the land and accordingly, the deposits made in Vijaya Bank were accepted by the Ld. CIT(A). With regard to hand loans taken from 14 persons, the assessee has not even given PAN etc., and in the absence of maintenance of books of account it was difficult for the tax authorities to crossverify the genuineness of the loa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rate addition of ₹ 3,84,400 is also not warranted since it is a running account having cash deposits. No doubt there are some instances which prove that some of the amounts were utilised for monthly credit card bills or repayment of loans but in the absence of any proof that assessee utilised the entire income earned from the business only for payment towards credit cards bills etc., it is not a fit case for making separate addition of ₹ 3,84,400. As regards the unexplained investmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

For The Assessee : Mr. D.V. Anjaneyulu For The Revenue : Mr. M. Sitaram ORDER PER D. MANMOHAN, V.P. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-V, Hyderabad and it pertains to the A.Y. 2007-2008. 2. In this case, assessee filed statement of facts and elaborate grounds of appeal which were not in accordance with Rule-8 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules and therefore, he filed revised set of grounds on 16.03.2016 which were taken on record. Briefly, the additions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Act but later on, it was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued on the assessee and thereupon, the assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act wherein the A.O. completed the assessment by determining the total income at ₹ 15,17,105. We are concerned herein with the unexplained credits under section 68 and unexplained investment of ₹ 1,74,644. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, the A.O. noticed that there are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to which the loans from City Bank and GE Countrywide are credited. However, the A.O. noticed that the assessee has not filed any explanation for the source of purchase of agricultural land for a sum of ₹ 11.18 lakhs. He also noticed that there are cash deposits of ₹ 4,37,000 and ₹ 3,50,000 in Vijaya Bank on 10.05.2006 and 14.06.2006 respectively. The source for the deposit of ₹ 4.37 lakhs were stated to be out of withdrawals from the Bank of Baroda of ₹ 1,82,000 (on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

availability of the amount withdrawn from Bank of Baroda for deposit in Vijaya Bank, as claimed by the assessee, is not tenable. Even with regard to cash loans from 14 parties, the A.O. noticed that none of them maintained any record on transactions and hence, the claim of cash loans from friends and relatives was rejected. Accordingly, he treated the cash deposit of ₹ 4,37,000 and ₹ 3,50,000 as unexplained credit under section 68 of the Act. Even out of the balance amount out of &# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h, 2007 and hence, it was not taken as the source for purchase of the land in the month of May, 2006. Similarly, the City Bank loan, reflected in the balance sheet was utilised for the purpose of business and hence, cannot be taken as a source for investment. He accordingly added a sum of ₹ 1,74,644 referrable to deficit of source of purchase of land (Rs.11,18,000 (-) ₹ 7,87,000 + ₹ 1,56,356). 5. Aggrieved, assessee contended before the CIT(A) that there are several cash deposi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

5.1. With respect to cash deposit of ₹ 3,50,000 it was contended that a sum of ₹ 1,75,000 was withdrawn from the Bank of Baroda account in June, 2006 and another sum of ₹ 1,22,000 was withdrawn on 14th June 2006. These amounts came to the Bank of Baroda account out of Citi Bank loan amounting to ₹ 3,07,443 which was received in 2nd June, 2006. Remaining amounts were received as cash loan from two persons and out of personal savings. 5.2. With respect to other cash deposit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ar withdrawal with a particular investment. However, considering the proximity of the dates, he assumed that ₹ 8,26,000 withdrawn on 15th May, 2006 might have been invested in purchase of land as the land registration was carried out on the same day. 5.4. Regarding cash deposit of ₹ 4,37,000 on 10th May, 2006, the case of the assessee was, a sum of ₹ 1,82,000 withdrawn from the Bank of Baroda was deposited. Here also considering the proximity of the dates of deposits, the Ld. C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

00, the Ld. CIT(A) admitted the source of ₹ 2,97,000 which is withdrawn from Bank of Baroda account and the balance amount of ₹ 53,000, claimed to have been received as hand loan from 2 persons and also out of personal savings was rejected. With regard to balance amount of ₹ 3,84,400, the Ld. CIT(A) observed as under : 4.5. Besides above cash deposits there are several cash deposits on various dates in the bank account of the appellant and it was claimed that these deposits are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d to look into the surrounding circumstances to find out the reality and the matter has to be considered by applying the test of human probabilities. It appears that whenever there is requirement of fund in banking channel the assessee deposits unaccounted cash in the account to carry out the bank transactions. Thus, I agree with the Assessing Officer that cash deposit of ₹ 3,84,400/- is not explained. 5.6. Similarly, with regard to unexplained investments in land, the Ld. CIT(A) was of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal before the Tribunal. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee, filed paper book and a brief chart to submit that under section 68 of the Act, assessee has to prove the source of funds and identity of the creditor which was also proved in this case and hence, addition sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) is not in accordance with law. As regards hand loans taken from 14 parties, the case of the Ld. A.R. is that confirmation letters were filed along with the details. It is the duty of the A.O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ges 33 onwards. Similarly, with regard to the unexplained investment to the tune of ₹ 1,35,644, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee adverted our attention to pages 27 of the paper book as well as page 32 to submit that the A.O. has made the addition, being difference in investment of ₹ 11.18 lakhs and cash deposits of ₹ 7,87,000, which is not permissible. He also submitted that no enquiry was made by the A.O. to crossverify the confirmation letters furnished by the parties evidenc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

htly not taken into consideration by the CIT(A). In this case, the CIT(A) observed that even during the course of hearing the assessee has not given any explanation regarding the balance cash deposits in the bank to the tune of ₹ 3,84,400 and further contended that assessee claimed cash loans during the period April to June, 2006 whereas the registration of the land was carried out on 15th May, 2006 and to the extent of proximity of dates of withdrawal, the Ld. CIT(A) having already grante .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version