Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Guntur Versus M/s. Jayalakshmi Fertilisers Ltd.

2016 (8) TMI 532 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

Cenvat credit - eligibility - wrong availment of credit on the strength of endorsed Bills of Entry - Held that:- the appellants have furnished along with these endorsed Bills of Entry, the invoices issued by the importer as well as the TR6 challan evidencing the payment of customs duty. Also the appellants themselves sought clarification from the Department regarding the eligibility and entitlements of CENVAT credit on the endorsed Bill of Entry. On receiving clarification that credit cannot be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ant Shri B. Seetharamaiah, Advocate for the respondent ORDER [ Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] This is an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order passed by Commissioner(Appeals) which set aside the confirmation of demand of CENVAT credit alleging that appellants had wrongly availed credit on the strength of endorsed Bills of Entry. 2. The appellants were served with the show-cause notice dt. 26/08/2011 proposing to recover CENVAT credit taken by them on the endorsed Bills of Entry and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppellants are manufacturers of pesticides, dusting powders, pesticides liquids and NPK fertilisers mixtures. They were also availing CENVAT credit on various inputs and capital goods. The appellants received 6 MT of goods from M/s. Makheteshim Agan India Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad (importer) under invoice and the importer had endorsed Bills of Entry in the name of the appellant. The appellant had also furnished copy of TR6 challan evidencing payment of Customs duty. It is the case of the Department th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f documents the Commissioner(Appeals) observed that Revenue has not challenged the fact of duty paid character of the inputs, their receipts in the appellant s factory and utilization of the same in the manufacture of final products. The credit is sought to be denied only for the reason that the document is an endorsed Bills of Entry. The importer at the material time of importation was not registered with Central Excise Department and he issued a commercial invoice in which all the particulars .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se of Meenakshi Match Industries Vs. CCE, Madurai [2010(262) ELT 925 (Tri. Chennai)]. Further the Hon ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana in the case of CCE, Ludhiana Vs. Pepsi Foods Ltd. [2010(254) ELT 284 (P&H)] in a similar issue has held as below:- 6. We have gone through the order passed by the Tribunal as well as the case law cited by the counsel for the parties. In the present case, although the capital goods were imported by M/s. Frito Lay India, but the endorsement in the Bill of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version