Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s D.B. CORP LIMITED Versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 (1) (2) AND 2

2016 (8) TMI 566 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Transfer pricing adjustment - would the exceeding of 20% of share holding by the directors and relatives of the petitioner-company in the aggregate in Writers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd satisfy the requirement of clause (vi) of Section 40A(2)(b)? Held that:- Chapter X of the Act pertains to special provisions relating to avoidance of tax. Section 92 contained therein pertains to computation of income from international transaction having regard to arm's length price. Sub section (2) of Section 92 by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mestic transaction would be computed having regard to the arm's length price. - The directors of the petitioner company, in the aggregate, held more than 20% of the shares in voting power in Writers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd. The aggregate of expenditure incurred by the petitioner to such company exceeded ₹ 5 crores. Under the circumstances, we would allow the transfer pricing procedure to carry on further without interjecting at this intermediary stage. The legal contention of the petitio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee company or the aggregate of the holdings is also not concluded in this petition. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5035 of 2016 - Dated:- 10-8-2016 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. A.J. SHASTRI, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR S N SOPARKAR WITH MR B S SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT : MR MANISH BHATT WITH MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has challenged reference made by respondent No.1, the Assessing Officer, to respondent No. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

O came to be rejected. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are that: The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act. For the assessment year 2013-14, the petitioner filed a return of income on 27.09.2013 disclosing total income of ₹ 330.00 crores (rounded off). A revised return was filed for the said year on 31.03.2015, however, the declaration of income did not change. Such return was taken in scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. During the course of scrutiny assessment, the Assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s objections by an order dated 10.03.2016. The petitioner raised further objections under letter dated 18.03.2016 which were also rejected by an order dated 22.03.2016. At which point, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. Case of the petitioner is that the provisions of transfer pricing did not apply to the petitioner. There were no international transactions nor were there any specified domestic transaction within the meaning of Section 92BA of the Act during the period under considerat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t portion of this report reads as under: The assessee mainly based its objection contending that the related party transactions reported in the audited account is in accordance with AS-18 and such transaction is not a transaction as provided in Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. The assessee further contended that the specified transaction has been defined in Section 92BA of the Act and the assessee is covered only by clause (I) and (vi) of Section 92BA of the Act. The assessee goes on to say that cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eport as required u/s. 92E of the Act if any other transaction including the transactions defined in as defined in clause (v) of section 92F of the Act, exceeding the limit of ₹ 5 crore. The assessee admitted that the following are th covered persons u/s. 40A(2) (b) of the Act. No. Name of the Person A/E Nature Amount 1 R C Printers Rent 12275136 2 I Media Corp Ltd. Advertisement & Publicity 4303048 3 Sudir Agrawal Salary 6000000 4 Ramesh Chandra Agrawal Sitting Fees 42474 5 Girish Aga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

respect is found to be incorrect. As stated above, clause (v) of Section 92F of the Act defined the transaction as transaction includes an arrangement, understanding or action in correct. In view of the above, the assessee clearly misinterpreted the provisions of Section 92BA of the Act. As any other transaction has been clearly defined in Section 92F(V) of the Act the assessee ought to have taken the transactions of the kind enumerated in clause (v) of Section 92F of the Act in arriving at the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Girish Agarwal Sitting Fees 84944 Do 6 Pawan Agarwal Sitting Fees 42472 Do 7 Kailash Chowdhary Sitting Fees 186124 Do 8 Piyush Pandey Sitting Fees 50562 Do 9 Hairsh Bijoor Sitting Fees 62472 Do 10 Ashwani SInghal Sitting Fees 186124 Do 11 Writers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd Advertisement 3541444 AEs within the meaning of Section 92A as common shareholder held more than 30% share of companies Rent 65339658 Interest income from intercorporate deposit 5264361 Purchase of investment in subsidiaries ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

son referred in Section 40(A)(2)(b) of the Act in view of clause (I) of Section 92AB of the Act. 2. The assessee has to consider any other transactions including the transactions as defined in clause(v) of Section 92F of the Act, including loans and advances (given/paid) to AE/related persons in view of clause (vi) of Section 92BA. From the table given above, it can be seen that the assessee has entered into transactions which has exceed the limit of ₹ 5 crore and as such the assessee was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssing Officer with a special focus on the above noted portion thereof, learned counsel Mr. Soparkar for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had not entered into any international transaction with associated enterprise. Attempt on part of the Assessing Officer, therefore, to bring the petitioner's case within the transfer pricing wholly erroneous. He submitted that the reasons cited by the Assessing Officer in the said report dated 08.03.2016 only referred to the associated enterpris .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pposite position. 6. Alternatively, counsel submitted that even these transactions referred to in para 11 of the report would not fall within the scope of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. He submitted that Clause (vi) of the said provision on which reliance is placed would not include the transaction since admittedly none of the directors of the petitioner-company held more than 20% of the shares of Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd or Bhaskar Infrastructure Ltd. In his submission, the aggregate shar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cally. In the present case, the reference of holding of a director would therefore must be understood in its normal grammatical meaning viz. holding of an individual director, without resorting to aggregation of the holding of the directors. In this respect, counsel relied on the decision of Division Bench of Punjab & Haryana High Court in case of Commissioner of Income Tax- 1, Ludhiana vs. Octave Apparels reported in [2014] 45 Taxmann.com 370, in which, it was held that where shareholding o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s for transfer pricing. In the present case, there was no such need, and the petitioner had, therefore, correctly not made any such declaration. 8. Counsel lastly submitted that when the basic facts necessary to bring the case of the petitioner within Section 92CA of the Act are missing, any reference by the Assessing Officer to the TPO would be wholly erroneous and without jurisdiction. He, therefore, submitted that the reference to the TPO be quashed. 9. Learned counsel Mr. Bhatt for the depar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion (1) of Section 92C of the Act. In this context, the counsel relied heavily on Clause (vi) of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act and submitted that the provision nowhere prohibits aggregation of the holding of the directors of the company. Counsel relied on the decision of Veer Gems vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and anr (supra) to contend that at this stage, the minute scrutiny urged by the petitioner should not be undertaken. 10.Having thus heard learned counsel for the parties and hav .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n case of specified domestic transaction also, given other requirements being satisfied; transactions would be computed having regard to arms length price. As per the sub section (2A) which was also added by virtue of the same amendment any allowance or interest or allocation of any cost or expense or any income in relation to the specified domestic transaction would be computed having regard to the arm's length price. 11. Section 92BA provides the meaning of specified domestic transaction a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion (8) of section 80-IA; (iv) any business transacted between the assessee and other person as referred to in sub section (10) of section 80- IA; (v) any transaction, referred to in any other section under Chapter VI-A or section 10AA, to which provisions of sub section (8) or sub section (10) of section 80-IA are applicable; or (vi) any other transaction as may be prescribed, and where the aggregate of such transactions entered into by the assessee in the previous year exceeds a sum of five c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

incurs any expenditure in respect of which payment has been made or is to be made to any person referred to in clause (b). In such a situation, if the Assessing Officer is of the opinion that such expenditure is excessive or unreasonable having regard to the fair market value of the goods, services or facilities for which the payment is made, it is open for the Assessing Officer to make deduction. Relevant portion of the clause (b) of Section 40A(2) reads as under: (b) The persons referred to i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

substantial interest in the business or profession of that person. Explanation.- For the purposes of this sub section, a person shall be deemed to have a substantial interest in a business or profession, if- (a) in a case where the business or profession is carried on by a company, such person is, at any time during the previous year, the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a right to participate in profits) carrying not less .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14. We have noticed that the petitioner had made expenditure in the nature of advertisement, rent and purchase of investment in subsidy to Writers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd., aggregate of which admittedly exceeds ₹ 5 crores. The respondents have, in affidavit dated 08.08.2016, pointed out following details: 1. I am filing the present further affidavit to bring on record the substantial shareholding of directors and relatives of such directors of the Petitioner D.B.Corp. Ltd in Writers and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

submit that as can be seen from the above, the directors of D.B.Corp. Ltd. and relatives of such directors hold more than 20% of the voting power in Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 15. To these factual aspects, the petitioner has raised no objection. In that view of the matter, the question would be, would the exceeding of 20% of share holding by the directors and relatives of the petitioner-company in the aggregate in Writers & Publishers Pvt. Ltd satisfy the requirement of clause (vi) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld that Chapter X does not contained any provision under which, the Assessing Officer would require to hear assessee and consider the objections before making a reference to the TPO. However, it requires certain safeguards. The Assessing Officer to consider it necessary or expedient to make a reference and the reference has to be made with the prior approval of the Commissioner. It was further held that while framing the assessment in terms of the report submitted by the TPO under sub section (3 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ations arising out of the order of TPO if it is found that there had, in fact, been no international transaction and that therefore, the reference itself was invalid. Relevant portion of the judgement reads as under: 14. Before making any such reference, sub-section (1) of Section 92C itself provides certain inbuilt safeguards. Firstly, the Assessing Officer has to consider it necessary or expedient to make a reference to the TPO and secondly the reference has to be made with the previous approv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cases with approval of the higher authority. 15. While framing the assessment in terms of the report submitted by the TPO under sub-section (3) of Section 92CA of the Act, there is nothing to prevent the Assessing Officers from considering the objections of the assessee that, in fact, there had been no international transaction between the assessee and any other person. If the assessee succeeds in establishing such fact, naturally the Assessing Officer would have to drop the entire proceedings i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of variation of income pursuant to such order of the TPO, the Assessing Officer has to, at the first instance, forward a draft of the proposed order of assessment to the assessee. Under sub-section (2) of Section 144C of the Act, on receipt of such a draft order, the assessee has an option either to file his acceptance of the variation of the assessment or file his objection to any such variation with the Dispute Resolution Panel and also the Assessing Officer. Sub-section (5) of Section 144C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

riations proposed on the draft order. Sub-section (11) of Section 144C of the Act provides that no direction under sub-section (5) shall be issued unless an opportunity is given to the assessee and the Assessing Officer. Sub-section (13) of Section 144C of the Act provides that upon receipt of directions issued under sub-section (5) of Section 144C of the Act, the Assessing Officer shall in conformity with the directions complete the assessment proceedings. Section 144C of the Act, thus, provide .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re binding upon the Assessing Officer. 19. The issue whether there was an international transaction or not can also be examined by the Dispute Resolution Panel at the instance of the assessee. There is nothing to limit the powers of Dispute Resolution Panel to completely nullify the variations arising out of the order of the TPO if it is found that there had, in fact, been no international transaction and that, therefore, the reference itself was invalid. Sub-section (5) of Section 144C of the A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version