Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Sandeep Ramniwas Agrawal Versus ITO, Ward-1 (3) Jalna

Penalty u/s.271B - Failure to get accounts audited - Held that:- In the instant case, no doubt the assessee has not furnished the audit report during the course of assessment proceedings but such failure has been explained by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee as due to non-appearance by the Authorised Representative of the assessee due to the marriage of his son and the illness of his younger brother. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and considering the fact that assessee has fil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ocumentary evidence to prove the reasonable cause for non-compliances of notices - Held that:- Submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the advocate was busy in marriage function of his son till 30-11-2011 and thereafter from 05-12-2011 onwards he was busy with the treatment of his younger brother who was detected with brain cancer and subsequently he died in our opinion is a reasonable cause for non compliance to the statutory notices. No doubt the assessee should have filed document .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that there was a reasonable cause on the part of the assessee for non compliance to such statutory notices. We accordingly set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the AO to cancel the penalty of ₹ 10,000/- levied u/s.271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act. - Decided in favour of assessee - ITA Nos.2167 & 2168/PN/2014 - Dated:- 17-6-2016 - SHRI R.K. PANDA, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM For The Assessee : Shri Harshit S. Kabra For The Revenue : Shri Hitendra Ninawe ORDER PER R.K.PANDA, AM : The abo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are that the assessee is an individual and is engaged in the business of trading of Iron, Steel, MS Scrap etc. He filed his return of income on 02-09-2009 declaring total income of ₹ 4,88,380/-. The AO noted that the assessee has not filed the tax audit report even upto the date of assessment, i.e. 15-12-2011 and has not attended before him for which he had to complete the assessment exparte. The AO asked the assessee to explain as to why penalty u/s.271B should not be levied for violation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AO did not accept the above contention of the assessee. He observed that the assessee has never filed the particulars of the tax audit report as prescribed. From the verification of the uploaded return, he noted that in his answer to Question - Are you liable for audit u/s.44AB? the assessee has categorically marked in the box provided as (X), i.e. NO. The assessee has not given the name of the auditor signing the tax audit report, his Membership Number, name of the auditor and PAN Number of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re or less reiterated the same submissions. However, the CIT(A) was also not satisfied with the explanation given by the assessee and upheld the penalty levied u/s.271B of the I.T. Act by observing as under : 9. I have carefully considered facts of the case and rival contentions. On perusal of the same, it has been noticed that the appellant has asked the appellant to file tax audit report on various occasions, however, the AO has not filed the same wither after filing the return of income or du .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fill out the relevant columns of the return forms on the basis of such report, however, the same should not be attached with the return. From the facts of the case of the appellant, pointed out by the AO in the penalty order, it is undisputed fact that the assessee has not filled the relevant columns of return of income requiring information about the Tax Auditor and tax audit. It has also been noticed that the AO. has asked the appellant to file the tax audit report on various occasions before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th. In this regard, a Circular No.3 of 2009 dated 21/05/2009 has been issued as a measure of precaution providing that the particulars about Tax Auditor and Tax Audit are to be furnished in the return of income to be filed by the assessees. The appellant has failed to furnish the said information in the return of income. Therefore, I am of the considered view that the AO. is justified in levying penalty of ₹ 1,00,000/- u/s 271B of the Act. I am also of the considered view that the appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee has got the audit report on 28-05-2009 and paid the self assessment tax on 26-08-2009 and uploaded the return on 02-09-2009. All these things clearly show that the contention of the assessee that it has obtained the audit report before the specified date is bonafide. It is not the case of the assessee that the tax was paid on the last day of the month and the return was filed thereafter for which a doubt can be raised in the mind of anybody that the assessee has not obtained the audit repor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

alty proceedings. He again reiterated that the assessee has obtained the audit report before the specified date and therefore no penalty u/s.271B is called for. 8. The Ld. Departmental Representative on the other hand heavily relied on the order of the CIT(A). He submitted that the CIT(A) has given justifiable reasons while upholding the penalty of ₹ 1 lakh levied by the AO u/s.271B of the I.T. Act. 9. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business, or of the gross receipts in profession, in such previous year or years or a sum of [one hundred fifty thousand rupees], whichever is less.] 10. From the above, it can be clear that the levy of penalty for failure to get the accounts audited or furnishing of report of such audit report as per the provisions of section 44AB is discretionary. The Assessee in the instant case has filed the audit report on 28-05-2009 before the AO during .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tant case is 30-09-2009. In our opinion, had the accounts not been audited, the assessee could not have determined the self assessment tax and paid the same on 26-08-2009 and could not have uploaded the return on 02-09-2009 especially when there is no finding by the AO that the figures of the audited accounts do not tally with the figures of the uploaded balance sheet and profit and loss account. There may be certain errors in not filling up certain columns in the uploaded return but that itself .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, no doubt the assessee has not furnished the audit report during the course of assessment proceedings but such failure has been explained by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee as due to non-appearance by the Authorised Representative of the assessee due to the marriage of his son and the illness of his younger brother. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and considering the fact that assessee has filed the audit report before the AO during the course of penalty proceedings, got his .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ming the penalty of ₹ 10,000/- levied u/s.271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act. 13. As stated earlier, the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 02-09-2009 declaring total income of ₹ 4,88,380/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and the AO issued notice u/s.143(2) dated 26-08-2010 requiring the compliance on 15-09-2010. Since there was no compliance by the assessee the AO issued notice u/s.142(1) dated 03-05- 2011 fixing the hearing on 18-05-2011. Since t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

comply with notices issued without reasonable cause u/s.273B of the I.T. Act. 14. Before CIT(A) it was submitted that although there was no compliance on 15-09-2010, however, the assessee attended the office of the AO on 18-05-2011 at 10.30 am but the AO did not reach the office from Aurangabad. Similarly, on 05-12-2011 the advocate to whom the notice was sent was busy in marriage function of his son till 30-11-2011 and on 05-12-2011 his younger brother was detected with brain cancer for which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not proved the reasonable cause for non compliance of notice as envisaged by provisions of section 273B of the I.T. Act. He accordingly confirmed the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act. 16. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A) the assessee is in appeal before us. 17. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides and perused the material on record. It is an admitted fact that the assessee did not comply to the statutory notices for which the AO levied penalty of S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version