Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.C.E., Delhi-III Versus Anant Raj Hindustan Ltd.

2016 (8) TMI 626 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH

Cenvat credit - inputs work in progress and finished goods lying in stock under Notification No. 15/2009 dated 07.07.2009 by making the payment of duty at the rate of 8% - Held that:- it is found that in this case, the Notification No. 15/2009 ibid came into effect on 07.07.2009, on the said day the respondent were entitled to avail the benefit of said Notification, although the respondent did not intimate to the department for availing the benefit of said Notification, but merely non-intimation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns are available to the respondent, therefore the respondent can choose any notification which is beneficial to him, the same view was taken in the Apex Court in the case of M/s Share Medical Care Vs. UOI [2007 (2) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]. - Decided against the Revenue - E/55141/2013 [SM] - Final Order No. 60782/2016 - Dated:- 29-6-2016 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Shri R. K. Sharma, Ld. A. R. for the Appellant Shri Rakesh Bhola, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER The Revenue is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he said goods without any condition and assessee is entitled to avail Cenvat Credit on inputs. After issuance of the Notification No. 15/2009 ibid, the respondent availed Cenvat Credit on inputs work in progress and finished goods lying in stock in their factory on 07.07.2009 and cleared the same under Notification No. 15/2009 dated 07.07.2009 by making the payment of duty at the rate of 8%. The respondent did not intimate about the same to the department and it was declared on 21.01.2010. There .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed 07.07.2009 and set aside the adjudication order. Aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue is before me. 3. The Ld. A.R. , appearing on behalf of the revenue, submits that as the respondent has undertaken that they are availing benefit of Notification No. 5/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 and they undertook not to avail the Cenvat Credit on inputs; the respondent has intimated to the department on 21.01.2010. Therefore, till 21.01.2010 the respondent was working under Notification No. 5/2006. Therefo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version