Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

2016 (8) TMI 667 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Cenvat credit - availed irregularly - assessee replied that it had availed the Cenvat Credit correctly and the Head office had issued ATDs (Advise of Transfer) for transferring of central excise duty paid on inputs and capital goods rather centralized at CTSD and that inputs and capital goods are transferred to them by their Head Office under the ATDS - Held that:- the assessee fall in the same Jaipur Circle where their Head Office transferred the ATDs on the capital goods transferred to them. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppellant ORDER: 1. Instant appeal u/Sec. 35G of the central Excise Act, 1944 is directed against order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dt.11/07/2014. 2. The brief facts noticed are that a show cause notice No. C. No.V(H) ST/Adj-I/89/07/2132-334 dt. 19/09/2007 and corrigendum dt. 11/12/2007 was issued to the respondent assessee where it was claimed that the assessee has availed Cenvat Credit of ₹ 13,59,408/- irregularly as detailed in Annexure A annexe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent of central excise duty on the capital goods transferred to them by their Head Office. The Additional Commissioner, who also was the adjudicating authority, was satisfied that the duty paying documents are in order accordingly held that the Cenvat Credit amount to ₹ 13,59,408/- is admissible to the assessee and dropped the demand of Cenvat Credit amounting to ₹ 13,59,408/-. 3. The Commissioner scrutinized the order passed by the adjudicating authority dt.25/04/2008 and was of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rregularly allowed and simultaneously interest u/R. 14 and penalty u/R. 15 be not imposed. 4. The ld. Commissioner, after adverting to the detailed reply of the assessee, did not agree to the contention of the Additional Commissioner as also the arguments raised by the assessee before him and while reversing order of the adjudicating authority, held that the Cenvat Credit was wrongly availed at ₹ 13,59,408/- on capital goods on the strength of an advisory note issued by the Head Officer si .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

₹ 13,59,408/- was improper, irregular and was not in accordance with law and once the Cenvat Credit was availed of on the basis of irregular/improper documents, the same was not allowable. He further contended that the adjudicating authority as well as the Tribunal erred in allowing the same merely because of the internal notes of the assessee which were not brought on record and not within the framework of claiming of Cenvat Credit and contended that substantial question of law arises ou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version