TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 755X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dingly the impugned order passed by the Tribunal is set aside and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned, but on payment of cost of ₹ 2000/-. - Decided in favour of appellant - Central Excise Appeal No.6 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 6-6-2016 - MR. AJIT SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE AND MR. SUMAN SHYAM J Mr. R Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Assistant Solici ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 27.8.2013. The appellant, thereafter, filed appeal before the Tribunal and since there was a delay of 84 days in filing the appeal, an application for condonation of delay was also filed. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, has rejected the application for condonation of delay. In the result, the appeal before the Tribunal also stands dismissed. It is, in this background, the appellant has fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e condoned the delay by imposing cost for the lapse on the part of appellant. We accordingly set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and condone the delay in filing the appeal, but on payment of cost of ₹ 2000/-. The appellant shall deposit the cost of ₹ 2000/- in the Tribunal within 1 month from today. The Tribunal shall, thereafter, decide the appeal on merit. 5. The a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
