GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 757 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2016 (8) TMI 757 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 426 (Tri. - Hyd.) - Cenvat credit - Township security services - security services in question were provided to their residential township which is not in or in relation to the manufacture of final products or clearance of final products - Held that:- the documents produced by the appellants indicate that the security services were provided by the service provider M/s Jayendra Security services only to the factory premises. Neither in the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de. - Decided in favour of appellant - E/20480/2015 - Final Order No. A/30607/2016 - Dated:- 20-7-2016 - Mr. Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member(Technical) Shri G.PrahIad, Advocate & Shri C.H. Sumanth, Chartered Accountant for the Appellant Shri Nagaraj Naik, AR for the Respondent ORDER The facts of these two appeal as put forth by the appellant are as follows. 2. Appellants are manufacturers of Heavy Machinery items and other items falling under various Chapters of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Canteen Service and d. Professional/ Consultancy Service. Appellants were issued with a Show Cause Notice proposing interalia recovery of credit amounting to ₹ 95,003/- along with applicable interest and imposition of penalty. Further, on the same issue, the appellants issued with another 14 show cause notices on a periodical basis, the details are as follows: S.No. Period Involved Central Excise Duty [Including Cess] (Rs.) 1 01.06.2007 - 31.07.2007 4,62,623/- 2 01.08.2007 - 31.08.2007 1, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, (adjudicating authority), passed the Order-in-Original bearing No. 28/2012 dated 30.11.2012, wherein the ordered the following: a Recovery of ₹ 49,02,682/- towards the Credit availed on ineligible services during the period from March, 2007 to April, 2012 under Rule 14 of the CCR; b. Demand of interest on the amount. c. Imposition of penalty of ₹ 49,02,682/- under Rule 15 of the CCR. 3. On appeal, the Commissioner of Central Excise, C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sing penalty on the Appellants under the provisions of Rule 15(1) of the CCR on the ground that no wilful mistake or suppression of facts could be attributed to the Appellants in the instant case, apart from a major part of the demand being unsustainable. Hence this appeal 4. During the hearing, the learned Advocate for the appellant, Shri G. Prahlad, made the following main submissions: 4.1 A perusal of both the definitions of the term 'input service' under Rule 2(1) of the CCR - i.e. t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed furtherance of the security of the concerned premises as an 'input service' on which the Assessee would be entitled to claim CENVAT Credit . 4.3 CENVAT Credit on the impugned service was denied to them by the lower adjudicating authority on the ground that the said service had been provided to the residential colony of the Appellants. They however submit that the impugned security service has been utilized by the Appellants only with regard to the factory premises where manufacture ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry 2014-TIOL-2554-CESTAT - MAD which held, inter alia, security services to be 'input services' within the ambit of Rule 2(l) of the CCR and held that Credit could be availed on the same. Similar definition was given by the Hon'ble CESTAT, Mumbai in the case of M/s Kisan Irrigations Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad reported in 2013-TlOL-403- CESTAT-MUM. 5. On behalf of the department, the learned AR Shri Nagaraj Naik, v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version