GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2016 (8) TMI 778 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI - Demand - recovery of credit availed - irregularly availed 100% CENVAT Credit in the same year on capital goods viz: Ingot moulds, Forged Rolls & Metal Rolls for the period 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08 - Held that:- the appellant is eligible to avail 50% credit in the subsequent year. In such case, there is no revenue loss and the availment of 100% credit in the same year of purchase is only a procedural lapse. The appellant has already paid the interest .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re the adjudicating authority's order dated 29.10.2009. Taking into account the evidence and the fact that appellant has paid the interest and penalty, I am of the view that the demand/recovery of credit availed is not sustainable. - Decided in favour of assessee - E/2628/2010 - Final Order No. A/30538/2016 - Dated:- 13-6-2016 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S. Member (Judicial) Sh. Mohd. Rahim, Advocate for the Appellant. Sh. N. Vishwas, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent. ORDER Brief facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

avail only 50% in the same financial year and the balance has to be taken in subsequent year. A show cause notice was issued demanding irregularly availed excess credit along with interest and also for proposing penalty under section 11 AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004. After due process of law, the original authority dropped the demand of excess availment of credit. However, the demand of interest thereon was confirmed, besides imposing penalty of ₹ 2000/- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

contesting the interest or penalty imposed and is contesting demand of credit availed only. He submitted that the appellant is eligible to avail the credit in the subsequent year and that therefore there is no revenue loss. At the most it would only be a procedural lapse. He pleaded that the appellant having paid interest and penalty, the demand for recovery of credit availed may be set aside. He placed reliance on the judgment rendered in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Vs CCE, [2005 (187) ELT 24 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version