Home List
← Previous	Next →

KEI Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

2016 (8) TMI 779 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Valuation - adoption of higher value of goods - Commission not included in the assessable value - Held that:- it is found that the identical dispute was the subject matter in that case and it was held that even though duty was required to be paid on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

AL ORDER NO . 52159/2016 - Dated:- 14-6-2016 - Ms Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) and Mr. V Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Shri Mayank Garg, Advocate for the Appellants Shri Yogesh Agarwal, AR for the Respondent ORDER The appellant is engaged in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

imed and examined and granted to them. 2. Thereafter, a Show cause notice dated 3.6.09 was issued proposing adoption of the higher value of the goods as appellant has not included commission in the assessable value. The said proceedings stand confirm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X