Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (8) TMI 824

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... T). Thus, it goes without saying that the Union of India will be bound by the said undertaking. As during the course of the argument, a question was posed by this Court to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to how these service charges have been quantified as the petitioner has stated in the affidavit that they have been paying service charges and the learned counsel replied by stating that there is no dispute to the said fact and the petitioner themselves have stated so in their letter dated 28.01.2009 stating that they are paying service charges to the Corporation of Chennai, half yearly, based on 33 1/3% of the property tax. Therefore, this submission is taken on record to state that there is no default on the part of the petit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ould demand the property tax for the buildings used by the petitioner Department which is owned by the President of India. The respondent has been demanding payment of property tax. However, at the relevant point of time viz., 2007-08, it appears that based on some circular which was prevailing during the said period and on certain advice, some amounts were remitted by the petitioner Department. But the respondent Corporation has received those amounts and issued receipts as if they were remitted towards the payment of property tax. 4. The petitioner addressed the respondent by letter dated 28.01.2009 stating that the Income Tax Department is paying Service Charges to the Corporation of Chennai, in respect of the office buildings and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Though the respondent Corporation have been served and they have entered appearance through a counsel, till date no counter affidavit has been filed. However, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent on instructions from the officials present in the Court submits that though the receipts are property tax receipts, what was collected from the petitioner was only the service charges and only the receipts were issued from the property tax receipt book. 8. In terms of Article 285 of the Constitution [Article 285(1) of Constitution of India] the property of the Union shall, save in so far as Parliament may by law otherwise provide, be exempt from all taxes imposed by a State or by any authority within a State. Thus, in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and ultimately an agreement was arrived at between the parties where the Union of India agreed to certain aspects. At this stage, it would be useful to refer to few of the conditions as recorded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 14.In view of the above, there is no need to consider the appeals on merits. We dispose of the appeals and pending applications by recording the following broad agreement between the parties: (i) The Union of India and its departments will pay service charges for the services provided by the appellant Municipal Corporations. They will not pay any property tax. The service charges will be paid at 75%, 50% and 33 1/3% respectively for the property tax levied on private owners, depending upon whether the Uni .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment, a question was posed by this Court to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to how these service charges have been quantified as the petitioner has stated in the affidavit that they have been paying service charges. The learned counsel replied by stating that there is no dispute to the said fact and the petitioner themselves have stated so in their letter dated 28.01.2009 stating that they are paying service charges to the Corporation of Chennai, half yearly, based on 33 1/3% of the property tax. Therefore, this submission is taken on record to state that there is no default on the part of the petitioner in remitting the service charges. 15. In the light of the above stated legal position, the writ petition is disposed of by ho .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates