2016 (8) TMI 886

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g of the order, probably by hand delivery, and issues of similar nature of earlier period as claimed had been under litigation, the appellant failed to submit the appeal within the prescribed statutory period nor within a reasonable period, thereafter. The reason for delay in filing in the appeal as stated in the application as well as in the affidavit, cannot be accepted as sufficient cause warr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld not be filed within three months but filed on 14.12.2015, as the Manager Sh. Satish M. Mahyavanshi, remained busy in re-allocation/shifting of their factory to Ambernath, Maharashtra, particularly during the period from December 2013 to March 2014. He submits that delay is unintentional. Further, he has submitted that on similar issue arising out different Orders the Appeals filed by the Appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant immediately two days after passing of the order, probably by hand delivery, and issues of similar nature of earlier period as claimed had been under litigation, the appellant failed to submit the appeal within the prescribed statutory period nor within a reasonable period, thereafter. The reason for delay in filing in the appeal as stated in the application as well as in the affidavit, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X