Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Jaipur-I Versus M/s. Herbicides (India) Ltd.

2016 (8) TMI 889 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Classification - whether the appellants’ final product is required to be classified as Plant Growth Regulator falling under Tariff Sub-heading 3808.10, as contended by the Revenue or the same is required to be classified as Bio-fertilizer falling und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n challenged by the Revenue and stands accepted. In such a scenario no infirmity can be found in the present order of the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein he has simplicitor followed the earlier order on the classification. - Decided against the Revenu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndent. ORDER The issue involved in the present appeal of the Revenue is as to whether the appellants final product is required to be classified as Plant Growth Regulator falling under Tariff Sub-heading 3808.10, as contended by the Revenue or the sam .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the issue already stands covered by the earlier Order-in-Appeal No. 163 (MPM) CE/JPR-I/05 dated 30/05/2005 in the same asseesses case where a detailed order on the classification was passed. Accordingly, he allowed the present appeal of the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rt from National Bio-fertilizer Development Centre, Ghaziabad. By considering both the reports as also the other facts, a detailed order was passed by Commissioner (Appeals), which has been followed by the Appellate Authority in the present case. It .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

accepted by the Revenue. Otherwise also, Ld. Advocate for the respondent brings to our notice various decisions of the Tribunal as confirmed by the higher courts, which are classifying the products as bio-fertilizers instead of Plant Growth Regulator .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version