New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (8) TMI 981 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2016 (8) TMI 981 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Recovery of interest - non payment/delayed payment of duty - Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - reversed cenvat credit voluntarily on POY lying which were received with out reversal of credit - irregular availment of CENVAT credit and non payment of duty - Held that:- the ld. Commissioner has categorically recorded that all these payments/ reversal of credit by unit 1, Unit 2 and Unit 3 of the Appellant were made after admitting to the cont .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

w. - Appeal disposed of by way of remand - E/443/2008 - A/10509/2016 - Dated:- 1-6-2016 - Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) and Mr. P.M. Saleem, Member (Technical) For Appellant (s) : Shri Anand Nainawati, Advocate For Respondent (s) : Shri J. Nagori, Authorised Representative ORDER Heard both sides. 2. The brief facts of the case are that on the basis of specific information, investigations were carried out on visiting the premises of the three units of the appellant, namely Unit 1, Unit 2 & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he said Order, the Appellant filed Appeal before this Tribunal. As the appellants were not heard properly, this Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for allowing them fresh opportunity of hearing and decide the matter afresh. Accordingly, the ld. Commissioner, after hearing the appellants, adjudicated the Notice by confirming the demand partly, imposed penalty and also with a direction for recovery of interest. Even though the appellant has challenged the said order, the ld .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emand confirmed against them for reversal of CENVAT credit under Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 on clearances of POY, as such from their respective Units for job work, is incorrect inasmuch as had they followed the alternate procedure prescribed under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, namely Rule 4(5)(a), they were not required to pay duty/reverse credit for sending the inputs as such for processing on job work basis. 4. Per-contra, ld. A.R. for the Revenue took us through the findings of the l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version