Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hitesh Madhukant Sevak Versus ITO, Ward 6- (4) , Ahmedabad and Vica-Versa

G.P. determination - rejection of books of accounts - Held that:- As in the given circumstances, where the assessee has shown better GP rate and no major defect has been pointed in the books of account, ld. Assessing Officer erred in rejecting books of account and therefore, no addition is sustainable by applying estimated GP rate @ 20%. We find no reason to interfere with the finding with regard to the issue of deleting the addition on account of GP rate. However, with regard to the addition of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Act and the disallowance made by lower authorities is fairly on an estimate basis, we find no reason for such disallowance and, therefore, we delete the same. - Addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment - Held that:- As the assessee’s financial statements have been accepted by the Revenue for Asst. Year 2007- 08 and addition made during the year under appeal emanates out of the opening balance of the capital account only and there is no evidence of any unrecorded investment in the ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the form prescribed u/s 139 of the Act. Moving further when we go through the Rule 37BA(4) we find that credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the account of Central Government shall be granted on the basis of information relating to deduction of tax furnished by the deductor to the income-tax authority and the information provided in the return of income. Now when we link up the provisions of section 148 of the Act with Rule 41(2) and Rule 37BA(4) of IT Rules, we find that assessee fil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

credit ought to have been allowed. - ITA No.1567/Ahd/2012, ITA No.1712/Ahd/2012 - Dated:- 21-7-2016 - Shri Rajpal Yadav, JM, & Shri Manish Borad, AM For The Appellant : Shri M. K. Patel, AR For The Respondent : Shri Prasoon Kabra, Sr.DR ORDER PER Manish Borad, Accountant Member. These cross appeals are directed against the order of ld. CT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad dated 2.5.2012 in appeal No.CIT(A)- XI/395/Wd-6(4)/11-12 passed against order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961 (in short the Act) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of facts and submissions filed as well as legal position, the entire estimated addition on account of gross profit requires to be deleted. 2. The learned CIT(A) has further erred in estimating the addition of G.P. at 20% of alleged unverified purchases of ₹ 7,74,687/- as against estimation of G.P. @ 20% of total turnover as made by the AO. In view of facts of the case and more particularly the nature of business of the appellant, the entire addition ought to have been deleted. The appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad not maintained regular books of accounts for the preceding year and had merely submitted copies of unaudited P&L A/c and balance sheet. (II) The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding that the bookresult of the Assessee were acceptable and the addition made on account of suppressed gross profit was not tenable. (III) The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in directing to allow credit for TDS to the Assessee ignoring the provisions of Rule 37BA(4) of the I T Rules, and also igno .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ncern in the name of M/s Gayatry Caterers, engaged in providing catering services. Notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued on 21.10.2010 on the basis of information that TDS was deducted in on the contract payment of ₹ 1,66,54,360/- for asst. year 2008-09 but no return of income was filed by the assessee. Assessee did not respond on few occasions against notice u/s 148 of the Act but finally furnished the return of income on 19/10/2011 declaring total income at ₹ 10,21,170/- on which ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of TDS of ₹ 3,96,191/- was denied by ld. Assessing Officer observing that the same cannot be allowed as per Rule 41 of the IT Rules as it was not a claim with valid return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. 3. Aggrieved, assessee went in appeal before ld. CIT(A) wherein the appeal was partly allowed and now both the assessee and the Revenue are in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. First we take ground nos. 1 & 2 of assessee s appeal in ITA No.1567/Ahd/2012 and ground no.(II) of Revenue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fit requires to be deleted. 2. The learned CIT(A) has further erred in estimating the addition of G.P. at 20% of alleged unverified purchases of ₹ 7,74,687/- as against estimation of G.P. @ 20% of total turnover as made by the AO. In view of facts of the case and more particularly the nature of business of the appellant, the entire addition ought to have been deleted. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, modify or delete any of the above grounds as well as to submit additional .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessing Officer that no proper supporting was available with the assessee in relation to expenditure of ₹ 7,74,687/- relating to purchase of milk, curd, vegetables, fruits, etc. purchased in cash and similarly, expenditure on consumption of cooking gas was not verifiable. Ld. Assessing Officer also observed that assessee s main client was Cadila Laboratories Ltd. but the assessee failed to furnish a copy of agreement entered into by him with the said client. Due to these reasons book resul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st three years GP calculated at 15.82%. Further ld.CIT(A) also observed that estimation of 20% GP by Assessing Officer was without any comparable case and prescribed procedure. However, in relation to the expenditure of ₹ 7,74,687/- incurred by assessee on various consumable items namely milk, curd, vegetables, fruits, cooking gas etc. which were supported by merely self-made vouchers, 20% disallowance of ₹ 7,74,687/- was sustained and accordingly out of addition of ₹ 7,09,229/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. as there is no fixed supplying for the same. Therefore, ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the disallowance of ₹ 1,54,937/-. 7. On the other hand, ld. DR supported the order of Assessing Officer. 8. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. We find that assessee has raised ground nos. 1 & 2 but the sole grievance is addition of ₹ 1,54,937/- sustained by ld. CIT(A) by disallowing 20% unverifiable purchase of ₹ 7,74,687/- whereas Revenue is in appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urn of income audit report u/s 44AB of the Act was also attached and TDS certificate from Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation, Cadila Health Care Ltd. and Erhardt + Leimer (India) Pvt. Ltd., copy of agreement with Cadila Health Care Ltd. and copy of bank statement, were filed before ld. Assessing Officer. We further observe that no major defect was pointed out by ld. Assessing Officer except for the unverifiable purchases of ₹ 7,74,687/- for purchase of material like -milk, curd, vegetable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e; 3), GP declared by the assessee for the year under appeal is 15.82% which is better in comparison to average GP rate. Further as regards unverifiable purchases of ₹ 7,74,687/- we find force in the submission of ld. AR that these purchases relate to buying of milk, curd, vegetables fruits, cooking gas and other day to day expenditure needed in the course of running catering business and such purchases are normally made from different suppliers on the basis of availability and demand of g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ircumstances, where the assessee has shown better GP rate and no major defect has been pointed in the books of account, ld. Assessing Officer erred in rejecting books of account and therefore, no addition is sustainable by applying estimated GP rate @ 20%. We find no reason to interfere with the finding with regard to the issue of deleting the addition on account of GP rate. However, with regard to the addition of ₹ 1,54,937/- on account of 20% disallowance on unverifiable purchases of  .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, we find no reason for such disallowance and, therefore, we delete the same. Accordingly, ground no.1 & 2 of assessee s appeal are allowed and ground no.2 of Revenue s appeal is dismissed. 10. Now we take up remaining grounds of Revenue s appeal in ITA No.1712/Ahd/2012. 11. Ground No.(I) of Revenue - The CIT(A) has erred in taw and on facts in accepting the explanation of the Assessee that the opening capital appearing in the balance sheet was brought forward from the closing balance appear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fficer observed that brought forward opening balance of capital account of proprietary concern was shown at ₹ 60,85,758. Ld. Assessing Officer also observed that assessee has not filed return of income as well as financial statement for Asst. Year 2006-07 and 2007-08 and, therefore, accepted the opening w.d.v. of assets motor car at ₹ 3,63,313/- and opening bank balance of ₹ 7,55,750/- and treated the remaining amount of ₹ 49,66,695/- (Rs.60,85,758 - ₹ 36,313 - S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uly recorded in the books of account and, therefore, addition made was bad in law and ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the same. 14. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. Through this ground Revenue has challenged the action of ld. CIT(A) deleting the addition made u/s 69 of the Act for unexplained investment at ₹ 49,66,695/-. We find that ld. CIT(A) has deleted the impugned addition of ₹ 49,66,695/- by observing as under :- 3.2 I have carefully consid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t this opening capital and the resultant figure of ₹ 49,66,695/- has been added by the A.O. u/s.69 of I.T. Act. 3.3 Taking entirety of facts in view, I am inclined to agree with the contentions of the Id.A.R. for the following reasons. The A.O. had made impugned addition u/s.69 of IT. Act, it will be pertinent to discuss provision of this section first. The value of unexplained investment made by the assessee in F.Y. immediately preceding A.Y. can be charged to tax u/s.69 of I.T. Act only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ras. (i) it is seen that A.O. had made addition against opening capital of the appellant. This makes it very clear that the A.O. has not detected any investment made by the appellant during the year under consideration. Accordingly, the first eligibility criterion of section 69 as mentioned above is not fulfilled. (ii) It is also a matter of fact that the appellant is maintaining the books of accounts and opening capital amount of ₹ 60,85,758/- has been recorded by the appellant in his boo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. The balance sheet and profit and loss account was filed by the appellant alongwith income tax return. The impugned figure of ₹ 60,85,7587- which represents opening capital balance is duly recorded in the books of accounts as well as balance sheet of the appellant. In view of these facts, it can easily be said that opening capital balance is duly recorded in the books of accounts' and accordingly as per second eligibility condition of section 69, addition against opening capital bala .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot furnished its return of income and accordingly opening balance shown by the appellant in balance sheet is not verifiable. In view of these facts, the A.O. made the impugned addition. However, it is seen that for the A.Y. 2006-07 and 2007-08, the A.O. had issued notice u/s.148 and the appellant had furnished income-tax returns for these years along-with audited balance sheets. Perusal of balance sheet for the A.Y. 2007-08 reveals that closing balance in capital account of Shri Hitesh Madhukant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions in that year and not in the current A.Y. i.e. A.Y. 2008-09. 3.5 It is further seen that A.O. had given credit of opening bank balance of ₹ 7,55,750/- and w.d.v. of motor car of ₹ 3,63,313/- against opening capital balance of the appellant. I am not in agreement with this working also. It is seen that audited balance sheet for the A.Y. 2005-06 was available before the A.O. during the assessment proceedings. In this balance sheet, appellant has declared balance in capital account .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y debtors for the current A.Y. This corresponds to closing balance of sundry debtors of ₹ 44,05,856/- as on 31-03-2007. This figure is also declared in in the balance sheet for A.Y. 2007-08. Since sundry debtors also corresponds to earlier year, accordingly, in my considered view, no adverse inference can be drawn in the current A.Y. 3.7 1 further place reliance on the case of Mohanlal Pukhraj v/s. DCIT (2005) 1(11) 1 TCL 160 (Ahd.Tri.) wherein it is held that income during various years c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The appellant has further earned profits of ₹ 9.93 lacs and ₹ 14.51 lacs in the A.Y. 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively. These facts reveals that appellant has accumulated profits year after year and that was sufficient reason of having an opening capital balance of ₹ 60,85,758/- in the A.Y. 2008-09. The A.O. has not considered these materials facts before making the addition. 3.9 In view of above facts, I am of the firm view that addition of ₹ 49,66,695/- is not tenable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the financial year immediately preceding the assessment year the assessee has made investments which are not recorded in the books of account, if any, maintained by him for any source of income, and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source of the investments or the explanation offered by him is not, in the opinion of the Assessing Officer, satisfactory, the value of the investments may be deemed to be the income of the assessee of such financial year. - 16. By applying the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial year and ld. Assessing Officer has taken the basis of opening capital of ₹ 60,85,758/- from the audited financial statement of assessee shown at Schedule-A of the audited balance sheet and has partly considered the opening capital explained to the extent of opening w. d. v. of motor car of ₹ 3,63,313/- and opening bank balance of ₹ 7,55,750/-. There is no mention of any other investment which is not recorded in the books of account. 17. We further observe that assessment u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elates to unverifiable purchases. Had there been any unexplained investment in the previous year i.e. asst. year 2007-08 then ld. Assessing Officer might have extracted such information and had made addition thereof. 18. We are, therefore, of the view that as the assessee s financial statements have been accepted by the Revenue for Asst. Year 2007- 08 and addition made during the year under appeal emanates out of the opening balance of the capital account only and there is no evidence of any unr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

les, and also ignoring the fact that the Assessee had not filed a valid return of income. 20. Ld. DR supported the order of Assessing Officer. 21. On the other hand, ld. AR submitted that TDS of ₹ 3,96,191/- was deducted on the contract receipts received by the assessee during the year and the same were claimed against tax liabilities for the year but was not allowed by ld. Assessing Officer by following the provisions of Rule 41 of IT Rules with the observation that as the assessee has no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. CIT(A) has allowed the ground of assessee s appeal and has directed the Assessing Officer to give credit of TDS of ₹ 3,96,191 vide para 5.3 of his appellate order. 23. Before going further let us first go through the provisions of Rule 37BA and Rule 41 of IT Rules which are as follows :- Rule -37BA. (1) Credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the Central Government in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII, shall be given to the person to whom payment has been made or credi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the other person and not to the deductee : Provided that the deductee files a declaration with the deductor and the deductor reports the tax deduction in the name of the other person in the information relating to deduction of tax referred to in sub-rule (1).] (ii) The declaration filed by the deductee under clause (i) shall contain the name, address, permanent account number of the person to whom credit is to be given, payment or credit in relation to which credit is to be given and reasons fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the Central Government and the income is assessable over a number of years, credit for tax deducted at source shall be allowed across those years in the same proportion in which the income is assessable to tax. (4) Credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the account of the Central Government shall be granted on the basis of- (i) the information relating to deduction of tax furnished by the deductor to the income-tax authority or the person authorised by such authority; and (ii) the info .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

person making a claim for refund of tax consists of dividends or any other income from which tax has been deducted under the provisions of sections 192 to 194 [, section 194A and section 195], the claim shall be accompanied by the certificates prescribed under section 203. (4) The claim under sub-rule (1) may be presented by the claimant in person or through a duly authorised agent or may be sent by post. 24. Also the provisions of section 148 of the Act will be relevant to be discussed here wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed; and the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if such return were a return required to be furnished under section 139 :] [Provided that in a case- (a) where a return has been furnished during the period commencing on the 1st day of October, 1991 and ending on the 30th day of September, 2005 in response to a notice served under this section, and (b) subsequently .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rther that in a case- (a) where a return has been furnished during the period commencing on the 1st day of October, 1991 and ending on the 30th day of September, 2005, in response to a notice served under this section, and (b) subsequently a notice has been served under clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 143 after the expiry of twelve months specified in the proviso to clause (ii) of subsection (2) of section 143, but before the expiry of the time limit for making the assessment, reassess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Article: SERVICES UNDER REVERSE CHARGE UNDER GST REGIME

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Highlight: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 - Notification

Highlight: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg. - Circular

Highlight: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 - Public Notice

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Circular: Amendment to Paragraph 2.72 (b) of the Handbook of Procedures of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20

Notification: Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Second Amendment Rules, 2017

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version