Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ludwig Pfeiffer Gypsums Structure India Pvt. Ltd Versus The D.C.I.T, Circle - 4 (1) , New Delhi

2016 (8) TMI 996 - ITAT DELHI

TDS liability - delay in depositing tds - Held that:- Delay in depositing the cannot be attributed to the assessee as the assessee had sufficient funds to deposit tax and he also secured ID and password to make online payment of TDS. However, the same could not be activated at the end of the bank, despite several requests by the assessee, hence the tax could not be deposited on or before 30.9.2008 as per provisions of the Act. We are satisfied that despite of all possible and sincere efforts on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hri Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Sr. DR ORDER PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER This is a recal led order passed by the Tribunal vide order dated 10.1.2014 in MA No. 177/Del/2012 recall ing the order of the Tribunal dated 25.4.2012 in ITA No. 3060/Del/2011 wherein the assessee s appeal had been dismissed on merits. 2. This appeal has been filed by the assessee and directed against the order of the CIT(A)-VI I, New Delhi, dated 15/04/2011 for AY 2008-09. 3. The effective grounds involved in this ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to technical change in the method of depositing TDS which was beyond the control of the assessee. 4. We have heard the rival submissions and have carefully perused the relevant material on record inter alia the assessment order of the ld. CIT(A), paper book filed by the assessee alongwith written synopsis spread over 10 pages. 5. The assessee company filed its return of income for A.Y 2008- 09 on 23.10.2008 and the A.O, while framing the assessment, had disallowed an amount of ₹ 58,86,15 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d for online banking in ICICI Bank in the third week of September and tried its best to get online banking. The ld. AR drew our attention toward the paper book of the assessee containing 17 pages and pointed out that there was sufficient bank balance with t of ₹ 20,14,379/- [paper book page 4] as per bank account statement with ICICI Bank to deposit ₹ 7,26,666/- TDS online and the bank also allotted ID Password to the assessee [paper book page 12] but the same, despite of several req .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion Mahatma Gandhi. The ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that the authorities below did not give any attention to the facts and circumstances which narrated the bonafide efforts of the assessee to deposit the amount on or before 30.9.2008 and ignored a vital point that the circumstances which could lead to only three days in depositing the TDS were beyond the control of the assessee. The ld. AR strenuously contended that the A.O as well as the ld. CIT(A) ignored these vital facts that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

due to the above stated reasons beyond the control of the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that there was a good and plausible reasonable cause in the delay of three days in depositing the TDS, therefore, it would be justified to allow benefit of the expenses in the relevant A.Y. The ld. AR also explained that the reasonable cause has been described by the jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of Woodward Governors India [P] Ltd Vs. CIT [2002] 253 ITR 745 [Delhi] for the purpose of applic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l Irrigation Systems Ltd. (Hyd) 56 ITD 164 6. ACIT v. Sri. Ramachandra 128 TTJ 408 (2010] (ITAT Chennai] 7. Jagdish Malpani v. ACIT 94 TTJ 321 (ITAT Indore) 7. The ld. counsel of the Revenue, replying to the above contentions, submitted that the TDS was actually deposited on 7.10.2008 and not on 3.10.2008 by cheque. He further pointed out that the TDS was deducted in the month of March 2008 but the same was not deposited immediately which does not show the bonafide of the assessee. The ld. couns .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

condoned by the CBDT, can be considered and condoned by the Tribunal by taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances and bonafide acts of the assessee. 9. On careful consideration of the above, we are of the considered view that as per the pay in slip and challan, the cheque of TDS was deposited with the SBI on 3.10.2008 and that it has to be presumed and is amply clear that the assessee deposited TDS on 3.10.2008 which was delayed by 3 days. When we further analyze the acts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ivation of online payment account was caused by the system failure on the part of the bank and not by the assessee. Undisputedly, and admittedly, 1.10.2008 was a bank holiday and 2nd October is a National Holiday being birthday of Mahatma Gandhi. TDS was deposited on the very next day, i.e. 3.10.2008 which also goes to prove the bonafide sincere efforts on the part of the assessee. In view of the above noted facts, we are satisfied that there was a plausible and reasonable cause which caused thr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts Ltd Vs. CIT [supra] wherein referring to the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia it has been held that the law does not compel a man to do which he could possibly perform. In the present case also, the assessee made several efforts to deposit TDS with prescribed time frame but there was delay of three days. In our opinion, when the online payment facility could not be activated by the bank and the two days lapsed due to the bank and public holiday, then the deposit of tax on the very next wor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the maxim actus curiae neminem garvabit, i.e., an act of Court shall prejudice no man, is founded upon justice and good sense which serves a safe and certain guide for the administration of law. The other relevant maxim is lex non cogit ad impossibilia - the law does not compel a man to do what he cannot possibly perform. The law itself and its administration is understood to disclaim as it does in its general aphorisms, all intention of compelling impossibilities, and the administration of law .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee trust, therefore, comes within, the ken of the maxim : hex non cogit ad Impossibilia. Taking into consideration the entire conspectus of the facts and respectfully following the precedent we uphold the impugned order. 12. In the order of ITAT Indore Bench in the case of Jagdish Malpani Vs. ACIT [supra] it was also held that: 9. We have considered the arguments advanced by the parties, in view of the materials available record, and orders of the lower authorities and the judgments relied .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ied by the Department to the assessee. There is also no doubt that whatever reason for the delay has been assigned by the assessee which was beyond his power and control is bona fide one, but the material question before us is as to whether there is scope in the provisions of law to accommodate such person, keeping in view the exceptional facts and circumstances of the case. Though impossibility of performance is in general no excuse for not performing an obligation, yet when the obligation is o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sideration of all particular cases (page No. 162 of Brooms Legal Maxims, 10th Edn., by Herberts Broom, LL.D). There is also no dispute that provision laid down under Section 80 of the IT Act is a machinery provision and as per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. National' Taj Traders (supra), relied on by the learned Authorised Representative, rule of strict construction applies only to charging provision or one imposing penalty and not machinery provisions. We th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version