Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Smt. Rukmani Santhanam Versus The Income Tax Officer, Business ward IV (4) , Chennai

2016 (8) TMI 1008 - ITAT CHENNAI

Computation of capital gains on exemption claimed by the assessee u/s 54/54F - Held that:- When the assessee entered into an agreement with M/s Doshi Housing Ltd allowing them to retain 40% of the undivided share in the property for a consideration of 60% of the super built-up area, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that there was a transfer of property to the extent of 40% of the undivided share in the land. The assessee has executed a power of attorney enabling the developer to sell 4 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntion of the ld. DR is misconstrued. When the assessee has transferred the residential house alongwith the land, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 54 of the Act. - Coming to the claim of the assessee u/s 54F of the Act, even assuming that what was transferred is only a vacant land, the assessee is eligible for exemption u/s 54F of the Act. The assessee’s claim for exemption u/s 54F of the Act was rejected on the ground that the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

favour of her son and daughter is only a family arrangement in the family and it cannot be construed as transfer of property. There may be various reasons for settling the property in favour of the assessee’s son and daughter. The fact remains that the property was settled by way of family arrangement for convenient enjoyment and the property remains with assessee’s son and daughter. Therefore, the exemption u/s 54F/54 cannot be denied. In view of the above discussion, while confirming the tran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rabhakar, CA For The Respondent : Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT ORDER PER N.R.S.GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-15, Chennai, dated 28.1.2015 and pertains to assessment year 2006-07. 2. The only issue arises for consideration is computation of capital gains on exemption claimed by the assessee u/s 54/54F of the Act. 3. Shri J. Prabhakar, ld. Representative for the assessee submitted that this is second roun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the assessee alongwith her father and mother continued to live in the property till 12.4.2006, therefore, handing over the possession on 20.1.2006 is impossible. Since there was no transfer of property on 20.1.2006, the capital gain, if any, can be assessed only in the next assessment year i.e 2007-08 and not 2006-07. The ld. Representative further submitted that the assessee claimed exemption u/s 54 of the Act. For the purpose of claiming exemption u/s 54 of the Act, the assessee has to tran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, the assessee is liable for exemption u/s 54 of the Act. The Assessing Officer has also disallowed the claim of the assessee u/s 54F of the Act on the ground that the assessee has invested in more than one flat. The Assessing Officer has also found that the assessee has transferred the house in which the investment was made within three years from the date of purchase. According to the ld. Representative, the assessee was allotted two residential units in the same block, therefore, it has to b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ement clearly shows that the physical possession of the property was handed over to the developer on the date of the development agreement. Therefore, the CIT(A) has rightly found that the property was transferred under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on 20.1.2006. Therefore, the capital gain has to be assessed only during the year under consideration. Referring to the development agreement, the ld. DR submitted that the assessee has to execute the power of attorney agent authorizing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot correct to say, according to the ld. DR, that physical possession of the property was not handed over to the developer. The ld. DR further submitted that what was transferred by the assessee is a vacant land and not a residential house, therefore, the assessee is not entitled for exemption u/s 54 of the Act. Referring to the claim of the assessee u/s 54F of the Act, the ld. DR submitted that the assessee was having two flats on the date of investment. Moreover, one of the flat was transferred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

perty. The assessee in fact nominated one Shri Mohul H. Doshi as her power of attorney agent to execute the sale deed in pursuance to the development agreement. Therefore, it is obvious that the property was handed over to the developer on 20.1.2006 when the development agreement was executed. A copy of the letter which is available at page 117 of the paper book shows that M/s Doshi Housing Ltd took physical possession of the property on 20.1.2006. When the assessee entered into an agreement wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ransfer of property within the meaning of sec. 2(47)(vi) of the Act on 20.1.2006. Hence, the capital gain arising out of the transfer has to be assessed during the year under consideration. 6. Now coming to the exemption claimed by the assessee, the Revenue claims that what was transferred by the assessee is a vacant land and not a residential house. The copy of the development agreement available on record clearly shows that what was sold by the assessee is land and building and not vacant land .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version