Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV Versus SCHUTZ DISHMAN BIOTECH PVT LTD

Addition made on account of inflated purchase - Held that:- The assessee was manufacturing pharmaceutical medicines which are being exported. The assessee was maintaining the norms which are prescribed by the Government of India for a particular pharmaceutical medicine which is to be exported. Since there was a variation in the ratio, the Assessing Officer made addition based on the statement of the General Manager, in-charge production. In our view, the Assessing Officer has based his addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the assessee. - TAX APPEAL NO. 1181 of 2008 With TAX APPEAL NO. 1182 of 2008 With TAX APPEAL NO. 1719 of 2010 With TAX APPEAL NO. 1720 of 2010 With TAX APPEAL NO. 1816 of 2008 TO TAX APPEAL NO. 1817 of 2008 - Dated:- 12-8-2016 - MR. KS JHAVERI AND MR. G.R.UDHWANI, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : MR NITIN K MEHTA, ADVOCATE FOR THE OPPONENT : MR TUSHAR P HEMANI, ADVOCATE ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) By way of these appeals under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

80-HHC by considering enhanced income of ₹ 1,06,51,980/- as having become infructuous on the ground that the assessee s appeal in regard to enhancement had been allowed? Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008: (1) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition made on account of inflated purchase of ₹ 1,95,62,054/-? (2) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the entire addition of ₹ 2,12,92,907/- made on account of rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unal is right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of 90% of interest received by the assessee from the profit of the business for the purpose of quantifying the deduction under section 80-HHC of the Act? (D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in accepting the assessee s claim for inclusion of 90% of income from the sale of advance license while quantifying business profit under section 80-HHC of ₹ 1,92,500/-? Tax Appeal No. 1720 of 2010: Whether the Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as not prepared in respect of question No. 2 in Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008 and therefore, he requires some time to prepare question No. 2. Tax Appeal No. 1816 of 2008 is filed against the penalty order issued by the Assessing Officer in respect of adjustment of ₹ 2,12,92,907/-. Since Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008 on this issue is kept on 31.8.3016, Tax Appeal No. 1816 of 2008 is not heard today. 4. Learned advocate appearing for the revenue Mr. Mehta has taken us to the order passed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nced the addition by ₹ 1,06,51,980/- making the total addition to ₹ 1,95,62,054/- and directed to recompute deduction under section 80-HHC of the Act by considering enhanced income of ₹ 1,06,51,980/-. However, in further appeal before the Tribunal, the Tribunal has deleted the addition made on account of inflated purchases of ₹ 1,95,62,054/- by following its decision in the case of M/s. Gujarat Woolen Felt Mills in ITA No. 887/Ahd/2002 dated 28.2.2006. The learned counsel .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s. ₹ 1,32,57,449/- on account of excess consumption of some of the raw materials as compared to standard input output norms prescribed by the Government of India for quantifying the export benefits given to exporters added as inflated purchases of raw materials. At the outset, the learned counsel of the assessee fairly stated that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the ITAT Bench-C Ahmedabad in ITA No. 887/Ahd/2002 for A.Y. 1997-98 dated 28.2.2006 in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

standards and the composition of the drugs will have to be maintained as per the prescribed norms and of internationally quality. For a particular medicine which is to be exported the Government of India has prescribed the input ratio of various raw materials which have been printed on the various sale invoices which have been mentioned by the appellant. As there was lot of variation in the ratio, to know the exact consumption of the raw material the statement of the General Manager (Works) name .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rnment and printed in the sale invoices. In reply to question No. 5, 6, and 8 he has categorically mentioned that the production of export items is as per the standard norms and these inputs are also mentioned at the bottom of export sales invoice. In reply to question No. 8 he has again confirmed that production of the item is as per the standard norms and the inputs are used as per the standard usage mentioned at the bottom of sales bills. If there would have been any variation in the consumpt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The appellant s submission that the consumption depends on various factors like efficiency of the plant and process involved is only an afterthought because the production manager who is the in-charge of production has nowhere mentioned that there is even slight variation in consumption from the standard input out ratio. The appellant has also not proved with any other evidence that the consumption has been different because of factors mentioned by it. Therefore, the consumption of raw materia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cannot be offset against each other as has been done by AO in the assessment order. The appellant s another argument that record are being examined by the excise department and sales tax department is of no relevance because the excise department is only concerned with the actual production and levy of excise duty rather than to examine the excess of deficiency of the raw materials which has been worked out only on the basis of standard input output ratio. Appellant s another argument that it d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned by it. The fact remains that the appellant has not been in a position to explain the deficiency and the alleged extra consumption of raw material vis a vis the standard input output ratio in view of the statement of the production manager who has strictly confirmed that the raw material has been consumed as per standard input output ratio. On these facts, the CIT(A0 finally enhanced the addition vide para 2.2.3, by observing as under: 2.2.3 From the facts on record and the above discussion, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pany. Thus the total addition which is liable to be made is ₹ 1,95,62,054/-. After considering the addition of ₹ 89,10,074/-, the income which is to be further enhanced is ₹ 1,06,51,333/-. Therefore, the AO is directed to enhance the income by ₹ 1,06,51,980/-. Accordingly, this ground is dismissed with direction to enhance the income by ₹ 1,06,51,980/-. The learned counsel of the assessee referred the Tribunal s decision, wherein the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Guj .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

centage of wastage cannot be said to be excessive. In these circumstances, particularly in the absence of any specific material to show that the assessee has made a false claim of wastage, which in any case is within the parameters laid down under the Excise Duty Exemption Scheme, no addition can be made to the income of the assessee. The conclusion of the Assessing Officer, as observed by the CIT(A) is based on the production register upto the carding stage is incomplete or partial stage of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny has clearly demonstrated that it would be better of had it imported the raw material as per the input output norms. The assesseecompany has claimed that it has consumed less than what is prescribed under the input output norms. The CIT(A) has wrongly relied on the input output consumption ratio and the facts in the present case are exactly identical what was before the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Gujarat Woolen Felt Mills (supra). Respectfully following the said decision of the Tribunal, we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of M/s. Gujarat Woolen Felt Mills (supra) rightly deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. He further contended that the decision of the Tribunal in M/s. Gujarat Woolen Felt Mills (supra) is not challenged before any higher forum, the Tribunal has rightly followed its decision and deleted the addition. 6. Tax Appeal No. 1181 of 2008 is consequential to Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008. If Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008 is dismissed, this appeal becomes infructuous. 7. We have heard learned co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer has based his addition on the basis of the documents which are not available on the record and based on the statement of the General Manager, in-charge Production. Whether the assessee has followed the prescribed norms is not within the purview of the Income-tax Authority. In our view, the Tribunal has rightly held that the CIT(A) was wrong in relying on the input out consumption ratio. In our view, the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) have gone on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

816 of 2008 arises out of a consequential penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer in respect of the adjustment made in international transaction relating to export of finished goods. Since Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008 is kept on 31.8.2016 for deciding this issue, Tax Appeal No. 1816 of 2008 is also kept on 31.8.2016. 7.2 Tax Appeal No. 1181 of 2008 is consequential to Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008. Since we have answered issue No. 1 in Tax Appeal No. 1182 of 2008 in favour of the assessee, Ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version