Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Piramal Health Care Ltd., (Now known as M/s. Piramal Enterprises Ltd.) Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) -2 (2) , Mumbai

2016 (9) TMI 1 - ITAT MUMBAI

Disallowance u/s 40(a) - Held that:- Once the amount has been disallowed under the provisions of section 40(a)/40 (a) (ia) of the Act on the reason that tax has not been deducted, the AO cannot invoke the TDS provisions for holding the assessee as, “assessee in default” u/s 201 (1) of the Act. But, if the assessee subsequently claims deduction of the amount after payment of TDS, charging of interest u/s 201 (1A) of the Act for limited period during which TDS was not paid as per the provisions of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

TA No.3125/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 26-7-2016 - SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Revenue : Shri K. Mohandas, DR For The Assessee : Shri Ronak G. Doshi, AR ORDER PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM: Out of these three appeals, the appeal in ITA No.2630/Mum/2014 by the assessee and the appeal in ITA No.3125/Mum/2014 by the Revenue are directed against order of the CIT (A)-13, Mumbai passed in appeal No.CIT (A)-13/IT-237/ Rationalisation / Or.602/11-12 dated 06 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

so passed by the ACIT (TDS)-2(2), Mumbai vide his Order dated 31-03-2011 for assessment year 2007-08. 2. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee, with regard to the Revenue s appeal in ITA No.3125/Mum/2014 pointed out that in this case, the tax demand is ₹ 8,78,889/- and thus, the tax effect in this appeal is below ₹ 10.00 lacs and further submitted that in view of the CBDT Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 brought out by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 no appeal should be filed by the Revenue before the Tribunal which has tax effect of ₹ 10.00 lacs or less and this circular is also applicable retrospectively to all pending appeals. The relevant extract the said CBDT Circular (Supra) is as under:- This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

harging of interest thereon u/s 201(1A) of the Act. For this, the assessee has raised following grounds in its appeal in ITA No.2630/Mum/2014 for assessment year 2009-10:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Mumbai ( the CIT (A) ) erred in upholding the action of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2 (2) (Ä.O. ) in treating the Appellant as assessee in default u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 19 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se and in law, the Hon ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Mumbai ( the CIT (A) ) erred in upholding the action of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-2 (2) (Ä.O. ) in treating the Appellant as assessee in default for short deduction of ₹ 59,21,831/- u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ( the Act ) and interest thereon amounting to ₹ 28,42,479/- u/s 201 (1A) of the Act. 2. The Appellant, prays that on the facts and in law it be held that, the App .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ult u/s 201 (1) and as to why consequential interest should not be charged u/s 201 (1A) of the Act . There was no response from the assessee s side before the AO and he passed order u/s 201(1) charging the TDS on expenditure of ₹ 2,63,89,265/- u/s 194 I of the Act @ 22.4% amounting to ₹ 59,21,831/-. The AO also charged consequent interest u/s 201 (1A) of the Act amounting to ₹ 28,42,479/-. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT (A), who also confirmed the actio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rough a chart produced before the CIT (A) and the same is reproduced at page 2 and 3 of the CIT (A) s order. He referred to the entries made in the chart that the provision is made as on 31-03-2007. When his attention was drawn to some of the entries for the month of April, 2006 and June, 2006, he stated that only the entries related to the year end i.e. March, 2007 were the provisions which are reversed and added as income for the assessment year 2008-09 and for these entries only he is contest .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sue can be remitted back to the file of the AO for verification of the facts. In terms of the above, the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that in case of provision made at the year end and it was subsequently reversed the assessee cannot be held to be assessee in default in terms of the provisions of Section 201 (1) of the Act in view of the decision of the Hon ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. V. DCIT (2016) 383 ITR 59 (Kar), wherein th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

query was put to the learned Counsel for the assessee to show the fact of reversal of entries, he fairly agreed that the issue can be remitted back for verification of the fact by the AO. In terms of the above, the learned Sr. DR however, agreed to the proposition but he also stated that consequential interest is to be charged till the date of payment of TDS. 8. After hearing both the sides and going through the facts of the case, we find that the facts of the case are not clear. The assessee h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version