Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle 11 (1) , New Delhi Versus Indian Suger Exim Corporation Ltd.

Disallowance of depreciation on office building, addition on account of foreign traveling expenditure, addition on account of foreign traveling expenditure, addition on account of unregistered Provident Fund Trust, disallowance u/s 14A, disallowance towards interest on late payment of TDS. - ITA No. 5943/Del/2010 - Dated:- 15-11-2011 - C.L. SETHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND PAHUJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Appellant by : Sh. Ashwani Taneja, CA,Sh. Sumit Jain, CA & Sh. Tarun, Adv. Respondent by : Sh. Salil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e building. 5. The assesse s claim of depreciation on building has been disallowed by the AO for the reason that the convenience deed in respect of property being lease hold ownership office, building and car parking at Ansal Plaza, was yet to be executed in favour of the assessee. The said disallowance has been made by the AO as so made in the A.Y. 2004-05. 6. On an appeal, ld. CIT(A) allowed the assessee s claim in the light of the finding of his predecessor on identical issue in the previous .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case of hearing of this appeal, it was pointed out by the ld. Counsel for the assessee that ld. CIT(A) s order passed in A.Y. 2004-05 has been upheld by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench C vide order dated 29.04.2011 by holding and observing as under: - 35. We have heard both the parties. There is no dispute about the fact that assessee had purchased the property in the financial year 1999-2000 and was occupied by the assessee. The assessee had been paying house tax in its own na .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e and also a narrow connotation. The meaning would depend on the context in which the terms are used. The decision in the case of CIT vs. Podar Cement P. Ltd. 226 ITR 625 (SC) has to be taken as a trendsetter in the concept of ownership. Assistance from the law laid down therein can be taken for finding out the meaning of the term owned is occurring in sec. 32(1) of the Income Tax Act. The term owned is occurring in sec. 32(1) of Income Tax Act, must be assigned a wider meaning. Anyone in posses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is owner of the property and is entitled for depreciation. Merely because the property has not been registered in the name of the assessee, disallowance of depreciation cannot be made. The decision in the case of Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (supra) is not applicable to the facts of the case before us as in that case the assessee had not acquired dominion on the property. But in the present case, the assessee is in possession of property; has been paying taxes in his own name; and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

deleting the addition of ₹ 10,25,151/- on account of foreign traveling expenditure. 11. It has been stated by the AO that during A.Y. 2002-03, 2003-04 & 2004-05, the expenditure in respect of attending meeting of Global Alliance for Sugar Trade & Reform & Liberalization was disallowed. It was submitted by the assessee that assessee company s Committee Members/Directors were regularly attending Doha meeting of WTO and that the meeting were attended to establish assessee s busin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in the A.Y. 2003-04. 13. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. 14. From the AO s order, it is clear that the AO has disallowed the traveling expenses to attend the conferences for the reasons given by him in A.Y. 2002-03, 2003-04 & 2004-05. The identical additions were deleted by the ld. CIT(A) in earlier years against which department did not file any appeal before the Tribunal except filing an appeal before the Tribunal in the A.Y. 2003-04. The ld. CIT(A) s ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt of foreign traveling expenses incurred for attending meeting of Global Alliance for Sugar Trade Reform & Liberalization. Respectfully following the Tribunal s order passed in A.Y. 2003-04, the order of ld. CIT(A) in the present A.Y. on this issue is upheld. 16. The next ground no. 4 is directed against CIT(A) s order in deleting the addition of ₹ 9,08,359/- on account of unregistered Provident Fund Trust. 17. The contribution to Provident Fund amounting to ₹ 9,08,359/- has bee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parties and considered the material available on record. Sec. 36(1)(iv) provides as under: - (iv) any sum paid by the assessee as an employer by way of contribution towards a recognized provident fund or an approved superannuation fund, subject to such limits as may be prescribed for the purpose of recognizing the provident fund or approving the superannuation fund, as the case may be; and subject to such conditions as the Board may think fit to specify in cases where the contributions are not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n it means a provident fund, which has been and continues to be recognized by the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner in accordance with rules contained in Part A of the Fourth Schedule, and includes a provident fund established under a scheme framed under the Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952. Since as per the letter issued by CIT, Delhi-III dated 28.05.1976 the provident fund is considered as fund to which Provident Fund Act, 1925/1952 applies, it amounts to a Recognized provident fund within .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ribution to Provident Fund Account. 22. In ground no. 5, the revenue has disputed the CIT(A) s order in deleting the addition of ₹ 10,00,000/- on account of disallowance u/s 14A of the Act. However, on perusal of ld. CIT(A) s order, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has actually sustained the disallowance to the extent of ₹ 649336/- as against disallowance of ₹ 10,00,000/- made by the AO. 23. In this case, it was found by the AO that the assessee has earned exempted dividend income f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ionate expenses in proportion to the exempted income to the total receipts. The working given by the AO is as under: 4.14 Thus, Administrative Expenses + Interest Expenses disallowed u/s 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961 on an apportionment basis = Administrative expenses + Interest expenses Total Receipts X Exempt income = 72,73,91,08 x 3,41,56,014 384,94,87,078 = ₹ 6,45,404/- As the above working comes to ₹ 6,45,404/-, and in A.Y. 2002-03 the CIT(A) has upheld the disallowance to the exten .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same amount was disallowed in A.Y. 2002-03. 25. On an appeal, the ld. CIT(A) confirm the disallowance to the extent of ₹ 6,49,336/- as against ₹ 10 lakh disallowed by the AO. The working of ₹ 6,49,336/- being the amount of disallowance sustain by the ld. CIT(A) is as under: - On a perusal of the details of the above expenses and nature of functions performed by the personnel, I find that the administrative expenses would mostly relate to the carrying on of the normal & p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

attributed to earning of exempt income. The contention of the appellant that expenses at the Port offices cannot be proximately related to their investment decisions which are made at Head Office is reasonable and therefore, acceptable. Accordingly, only such of the administrative expenses which are made at Head Office and which can be reasonably corelated to earning of exempt income are considered for disallowance. These expenses are in the nature of Printing & stationary (Rs. 4,26,054/-), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed it is observed that the appellant admittedly has a GM and Dy. GM whose gross salary and allowance for the year are ₹ 3,91,064/- and ₹ 1,86,594/- respectively. Further salary paid to accounts department personnel at Head Office is ₹ 7,68,925/-. Apart from this the proportionate contribution on account of PF by the appellant company in case of GM, DM & accounts department is ₹ 32785/-, ₹ 15643/-, and ₹ 64464/- respectively. Likewise proportionate welfare .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

can be made on a reasonable basis and that expenses can be apportioned for the above purpose, as per the extensive quotations from the relevant portions of the said judgment. Considering the fact that there has been an additional investment of ₹ 31.6 crores in shares and mutual funds during the year, in my opinion, it would be reasonable to disallow u/s14A of the Act 15% of salary & remuneration paid to the GM & Dy. GM of the company. The total remuneration paid to them (which inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,59,967/- an amount of 2% thereof (the appellant ahs in its submission dated 08.10.10 has allocated 1% of such expenses) is reasonably attributed to earning of exempted income. This works out to ₹ 4,43,199/- which is disallowed u/s 14A of the I.T. Act. Thus, the total disallowance u/s 14A of the I.T. Act and as discussed above would work out to ₹ 6,49,336/- (Rs. 1,09,217 + ₹ 96,920 + ₹ 4,43,199) Apart from this disallowance which is calculated and confirmed above ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/s 14A of the Act. We, therefore, take up this issue raised by the assessee as well as by the revenue, together. 28. We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. On perusal of AO s order, we find that the AO has worked out the proportionate expenses incurred for earning the exempted income at ₹ 6,45,404/-. However, he disallowed the sum of ₹ 10 lakh in the light of the disallowance sustained by ld. CIT(A) in A.Y. 2002-03. However, in the present assessment year, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version