Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) , Ludhiana Versus Smt. Satish Bala Malhotra And Others

Disallowance of deduction under Section 33(1)(iii) in relation to interest paid by the assessee - ITAT deleted the addition - Held that:- A perusal of the balance-sheet showed that the capital of the assessee included the profit earned during the year and that, therefore, both the closing capital and the profit earned during the year could not be considered as being available separately for advancing the interest free loans. Even assuming that to be so, it would make no difference. This is for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h exceeded the capital of the assessee. However, Mr. Katoch was unable to invite our attention to any part of the record which established this assertion. He merely relied upon the observation. Further, the nature of this investment is also not indicated. Nor is there anything to indicate that such investment was made out of the capital. There is no co-relation of the investment made and the interest bearing loan and the capital available to the assessee. In these circumstances, the Tribunal’s a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The assessee was one Ashok Kumar Malhotra who carried on business in the firm name and style of M/s Modern Publishers as the sole proprietor thereof. The three respondents are his heirs. 3. Questions (i) to (v) raised in the appeal do not survive in view of an order of the earlier Division Bench of this Court dated 28.10.2013. These questions relate to the issue regarding the deletion of an addition on account of deemed dividend with respect to an amount received by the deceased assessee for th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ving interest free capital before any interest free advance was made and that there is nothing on record by any of the authorities below that the assessee had used the interest bearing funds for other than business purposes, whereas the assessee had submitted that loan raised by the assessee has been used for the purpose of business, ignoring the specific finding of the AO that the claims of the assessee that interest bearing funds were not diverted as interest free loan and that advances were g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ses, whereas the assessee had submitted that loan raised by the assessee has been used for the purpose of business, ignoring the specific finding of the Ld. CIT(A) that the onus of proving that funds advances free of interest to sister concerns during the year were on account of commercial expediency, was on the assessee and merely giving of the money to the sister concern does not prove the commercial expediency, unless it is shown that the amounts have been used commercially even by the sister .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Assessing Officer passed an assessment order under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act). The assessee challenged the same before the CIT (Appeals). On 22.01.2009, a search was carried out under Section 132 of the Act at the assessee s premises. On 23.11.2009, the assessee filed a return of income under Section 153 A. There was no difference between the two returns. 6. On 26.02.2010, the CIT (Appeals) passed an order in the assessee s appeal against the assessment order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elief to the assessee. The assessee accordingly filed two appeals against the two orders of the CIT (Appeals). The appellant-department also filed two appeals against the said orders of the CIT (Appeals) to the extent of the reliefs granted to the assessee. There were accordingly four appeals before the Tribunal and correspondingly four appeals before this Court. 7. This brings us back to the above questions raised in the appeal. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction under Section 33(1) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer, the assessee paid various amounts of interest of which interest of an amount of Rs. 46.63 lacs is relevant in this appeal. The said amount of Rs. 46.63 lacs was paid as interest during the accounting year from the assessee s overdraft account. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest on a proportionate basis. 8. The assessee established that he had capital of Rs. 12.69 crores, received an interest free loan from his wife in the sum of Rs. 1.18 crores and earned profit of Rs. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eals) found that he had made out a case of commercial expediency. 9. The Tribunal, however, did not consider the issue of commercial expediency having come to the conclusion that the assessee in any event had established that the interest free loans were made from the free reserves available to him. Had we decided this issue in favour of the revenue, it would have been necessary to remand the matter to the Tribunal to consider the case of commercial expediency both on behalf of the revenue as we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

siness purposes. Mr. Katoch, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant was also unable to establish the same. Further, even before us, it has not been established that the assessee did not have sufficient interest free capital to the extent of Rs. 7.37 crores which is the amount advanced by him free of interest. Nor was our attention invited to any material to indicate that it is the interest bearing loan which was in turn advanced free of interest to the assessee s sister concerns. 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version