Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Gyarsi Lal Vijay Versus CIT & Others

2016 (9) TMI 117 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Penalty u/s.271 (D) - deemed income u/s 68 versus loan or deposits u/s 269SS - Held that:- If any sum is found credited in the books of account and the assessee fails to offer satisfactory explanation regarding the nature and source so offered by him or fails to tender satisfactory explanation, the said amount can be treated as deemed income of the assessee, in our view once it has been held as deemed income of the assessee or an addition u/s.68, has been made the character of the said amount/ad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

JUDGMENT ( Per Ranka, J. ) 1. Instant income tax appeal u/s.260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order dt.26.9.2001 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. It relates to the assessment year 1991-92. Following question of law was admitted by this Court :- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal was justified in sustaining the penalty of ₹ 20000/- u/s.271 (D) of the Income Tax Act 1961 ?" 2. The brief facts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

posit and the AO made a separate addition of ₹ 20000/- by invoking provisions of section 68. The said addition u/s.68 was confirmed by the CIT (A) as also by the Tribunal. 3. Proceedings for initiation of penalty u/s.271-D was initiated on the premise that the said amount of ₹ 20,000/- having been received in cash from Smt. Rukmani Devi, wife of the appellant is in violation on provisions of section 269-SS, penalty as such u/s.271-D was imposable. A show cause notice was issued and i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as a cash credit u/s.68 and separate addition of ₹ 20,000/- was made u/s.68 and once it has been held to be deemed income of the assessee it cannot be treated for the purposes of section 269-SS as a loan or deposit and thus this found favour with the CIT (A), who deleted the penalty. 5. The revenue assailed the said deletion before the Tribunal however the Tribunal upheld the penalty by holding that violation of section 269-SS and section 68 are two separate cause of action and even if it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly he contended that there is a reasonable cause as the transaction is in between husband and wife and there can always be inter se transaction between husband and wife on account of a bonafide belief that either spouse can deposit certain amount taking into consideration the close relationship. He further contended that once it has been held to be deemed income of the assessee u/s.68, it becomes real income of the assessee, then the character of the said amount does not remain as a loan or depo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts and therefore addition of ₹ 20,000/- was made. Since the said amount was shown as amount having been received in cash, therefore, there was violation of section 269-SS as well and admittedly the amount has been received from wife and it could not be anything except loan or deposit and the amount being in excess of the prescribed limit u/s.269-SS, penalty has been rightly sustained by the Tribunal. 8. We have considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, in our view t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

und credited in the books of an assessee maintained for any previous year, and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source thereof or the explanation offered by him is not, in the opinion of the [Assessing] Officer, satisfactory, the sum so credited may be charged to income-tax as the income of the assessee of that previous year : [Provided that where the assessee is a company (not being a company in which the public are substantially interested), and the sum so credited consi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version