Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Siseri Agro Farms P. Ltd. And 40 Others Versus Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Central Circle-3 (2) , Hyderabad.

Nature of land - whether the said lands fall within the definition of ‘Urban land’, so as to bring it to wealth tax? - Held that:- The issue whether the said lands fall within the definition of ‘Urban land’, so as to bring it to wealth tax require re-examination by the Assessing Officer in the light of the fact that Bachupally village is not in the Qutubullapur Municipality and also not one among the 8 Gram Panchayats notified in 16.04.2007 notification. Moreover, the said notification was also .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

restored to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. - WTA. No. 27/H/2016 to 67/H/2016 - Dated:- 24-8-2016 - Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President And Shri B. Ramakotaiah, Accountant Member For Assessee : Mr. K.C. Devdas For Revenue : Mr. K.J. Rao and Smt. U. Minichandran ORDER Per Bench This group of 41 appeals belongs to companies of Satyam group and involve similar issue. Assessees have raised common grounds in all appeals. Therefore, the appeals are heard together and decided by this common or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion of Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Central Circle-3(2), Hyderabad. Assessee-company owns certain assets, mainly agricultural lands. It has not filed any wealth tax return for the impugned assessment year as it considered that there is no taxable wealth. On the valuation date, i.e., as on 31.03.2008, Assessing Officer was of the opinion that the lands in question are Urban Lands within the meaning of assets falling under the provisions of Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Upon rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by an order dt. 28.11.2014. The Assessing Officer in the assessment proceedings relied on notification issued for GHMC on 16.04.2007 in which Qutubullapur Municipality, which was then separate municipality but not notified in the Central Government notification for wealth tax purposes, was clubbed into Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. Assessee objected in detail to submit that the contention of Assessing Officer that lands situated at Bachupalli (v) is within 8 KM of Greater Hyderabad Municipa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t and used for agricultural operations from the scope of Urban Land . It was contended that the lands are agricultural lands in the records of Government and are used for agricultural purposes. 3.1. Assessing Officer however did not agree. His reasoning for rejecting the assessee contentions are as under : Regarding assessee's claim that the company's lands are situated beyond the limits of 8 KM of notified municipal limits of Hyderabad, the assessee's claim is not acceptable for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Dept. dated 16-04-2007 have issued orders to include the areas covered by the erstwhile 12 surrounding Municipalities Viz., 1. L.B. Nagar, 2. Gaddiannaram, 3. Uppal, 4. Malkajgiri, 5. Kapra, 6. Alwal, 7. Quthbullapur, 8. Kukatpually. 9. Serilingampalli. 10. Rajendranagar, 11. Ramachandrapuram and 12. Patancheruvu within the limits of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and establish Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. Besides, Govt. of A.P. have also issued order vide G.O.Ms. No. 249 to 260 dt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ithin the stipulated 8 km. distance with regard to the said notified Corporation w.e.f. 16-04-2007 onwards. Whereas, in the instant case the assessee was in possession of 5.00 Acres. Land situated in 5y.No. 206/P of Bachupally (V) valued at ₹ 3,75,00,000 (guide line value ₹ 75,00,000 per acre) needs to be classified as urban land instead of Agl. Lands for the purpose of Wealth tax. In view of the above the assessee's claim is not acceptable hence rejected. 3.2. Accordingly, the w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he circumstances of notification of GHMC to hold that land within 8 km of GHMC limits qualifies as a urban land in terms of section 2(ea)(v) as explained at Explanation l(b)(ii). In the Assessing Officer's reliance on the GO the Ld. A.R sees conflict being set up between a central enactment and a state enactment. It was vehemently argued that nothing in a 'State' enactment can trigger liability under a 'Central' tax. 07.4. An identical matter was decided in the case of M/s. M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

MCH by a different name and with extended jurisdiction. To see MCH and GHMC has two separate and mutually exclusive urban bodies is fallacious. Therefore, there is no need for a separate notification in the name of GHMC. • (The State Government acting within its powers renotified the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and gave it a different name. The Assessing Officer merely applied to Wealth Tax Act to the notified and existing Municipality with reference to the limits .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aws and Central law on these facts. 08.0 With regard to the assessee's claim the lands were agricultural in nature, the Assessing Officer records that the assessee was called upon to furnish documentary evidence in support of the claim. More specifically, the assessee was asked if he could produce bills/vouchers in support of purchases/ expenses incurred for such agricultural activities, or copies of sale bills evidencing sale of agricultural produce. The assessee claimed expenditure of S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

section 2(ea)(v) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 is, therefore, upheld by dismissing Ground No.3(a) and 3(b). 5. It was the contention of the Learned Counsel that - (a) Lands of assessee are agricultural lands. (b) They are situated in Bachupally village which was in the Qutubullapur Mandal and not in Qutubullapur Municipality. (c) The notification issued on 16.04.2007 including about 12 Municipalities i.e., 1. L.B. Nagar, 2. Gaddiannaram, 3. Uppal Kalan 4. Malkajgiri, 5. Kapra, 6. Alwal, 7. Quthbu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

illage Bachupalli was not yet covered in the notification dated 16.04.2007 considered by the Assessing Officer. (e) Even the G.O.Ms.No. No.416 dated 05.09.2013 was cancelled by G.O.Ms.No.12 dated 07.01.2004 by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, so at present Bachupally is still a Gram Panchayat and so the said notification referred does not apply at present. (f) The lands in question are not within 8 K.Ms of Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. Learned Counsel relied on the Hon ble Karnataka High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A) however, has no objection to set aside the matter, as subsequent developments are not within the knowledge of Assessing Officer. 7. We have considered the rival contentions. The issue whether the said lands fall within the definition of Urban land , so as to bring it to wealth tax require re-examination by the Assessing Officer in the light of the fact that Bachupally village is not in the Qutubullapur Municipality and also not one among the 8 Gram Panchayats notified in 16.04.2007 notificati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version