Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (9) TMI 226 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD

2016 (9) TMI 226 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD - TMI - Valuation - includability - amount of royalty paid by customers in the assessable value of CD-ROMs manufactured - Held that:- it is found that Annexure-D to the SCN is relevant to be examined, to find out whether the quantification is presumptive in nature. We find that the agreements subsequent to the period of dispute in the SCN were taken into consideration to arrive at the amount of royalty charges paid by third party per CD for the period, subsequ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resumptive assessable value of ₹ 86,16,596/-. Therefore, the SCN is presumptive and hence, the impugned SCN is not sustainable. - Decided in favour of appellant - E/2521/2007-EX[DB] - Final Order No. 70539/2016 - Dated:- 18-7-2016 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) Shri Atul Gupta, Advocate & Shri Hrishikesh, Advocate for Appellant Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt (AR) ORDER The present appeal is preferred against Order-in-Appeal No.73/C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e (herein after referred to as SCN) dated 05-05-2006 was issued to appellant demanding Central Excise Duty amounting to ₹ 13,78,655/- by invoking proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944, along with proposal for interest and penalty. The quantification of the amount of duty demand was provided in Annexure-D enclosed to the said Show Cause Notice dated 05-05-2006. The said Show Cause Notice was adjudicated through Order-in-Original No. 19/addl. Commissioner/Noid .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s need to be cumulatively satisfied for addition of royalty and license fee to arrive at assessable value of imported goods and since the appellant has no obligation for payment of royalty, it cannot be included in assessable value in terms of said Rules. They have also relied on various case laws. 4. Heard the Id. Counsel for appellant who has taken us through the quantification of differential assessable value arrived at for the purpose of quantification of duty demand which is available at An .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version