Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik Versus Prakash Products

2016 (9) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Double taxation - Taxability under Additional Duties of Excise in lieu of sales tax - branded ghutka manufactured and cleared - both the lower authorities have held that the goods manufactured by the appellant would fall under Chapter 24 while the respondent has classified the products under Chapter 21 - Held that:- it is seen from the records that if the products are classified under Chapter 24, the respondent has to discharge the additional duty of excise in lieu of sales tax, while if the pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arise only if the products are classified under Chapter 24. - Decided against the Revenue - E/2466/05-Mum - A/89293/16/EB - Dated:- 19-8-2016 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) and Mr. C.J. Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri S. Hasija, Superintendent (AR), for appellant Shri D.H. Nadkarni, Advocate, for respondent ORDER This appeal is filed by the Revenue against order-in-appeal No. CEX.XI/JMJ/67/NSK/APL/2005 dated 30.6.2005. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ariff Act, 1985. The adjudicating authority, after following due process of law, confirmed the demands raised and also held that the classification of the products would fall under Chapter 24. He also confirmed the demands with interest and penalties were also imposed. On appeal, the first appellate authority set aside the demands holding that the classification of the product, even if it is under Chapter 24, the appellant having paid the sales tax on the products and cleared under Chapter 21, n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

order of the Commissioner (Appeals) recording that the sales tax had been paid on the same products when cleared under Chapter 21 is incorrect as the tax liability needs to be discharged under the Chapter heading which is appropriate for the products manufactured. 5. The learned counsel would draw our attention that identical issue came up before the Tribunal in the case of Gahoi Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Indore and the Tribunal held that the classification of the product would fall under Chapte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version